Back

Pneumatically Controlled Non-Equibiaxial Cell Stretching Device with Live-cell Imaging

Wang, J.; Chatterjee, A.; Zigan, C. M.; Alborn, M. J.; Chan, D.; Chortos, A.

2023-06-15 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.06.15.545174 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveAdherent cell behavior is influenced by a complex interplay of factors, including chemical and mechanical signals. In vitro experiments that mimic the mechanical environment experienced by cells in vivo are crucial for understanding cellular behavior and the progression of disease. In this study, we developed and validated a low-cost pneumatically-controlled cell stretcher with independent control of strain in two directions of a membrane, enabling unequal biaxial stretching and realtime microscopy during actuation. MethodsThe stretching was achieved by two independent pneumatic channels controlled by electrical signals. We used finite element simulations to compute the membranes strain field and particle tracking algorithms based on image processing techniques to validate the strain fields and measure the cell orientation and morphology. ResultsThe device can supply uniaxial, equibiaxial, and unequal biaxial stretching up to 15% strain in each direction at a frequency of 1Hz, with a strain measurement error of less than 1%. Through live cell imaging, we determined that distinct stretching patterns elicited differing responses and alterations in cell orientation and morphology, particularly in terms of cell length and area. ConclusionThe device successfully provides a large, uniform, and variable strain field for cell experiments, while also enabling real-time, live cell imaging. SignificanceThis scalable, low-cost platform provides mechanical stimulation to cell cultures by independently controlling strains in two directions. This could contribute to a deeper understanding of cellular response to biorealistic strains and could be useful for future in vitro drug testing platforms.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.