Back

Disentangling the cascading effects of Grapevine Red Blotch Virus infection on vine physiology

Copp, C. R.; DeShields, J. B.; Kar, S.; Kirk, C.; Clark, R.; Stowasser, M.; KC, A. N.; Levin, A.

2023-06-15 plant biology
10.1101/2023.06.15.545163 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Grapevine Red Blotch Virus is a major grapevine pathogen and is associated with reduced carbon assimilation and delayed berry ripening in Vitis vinifera L. Recent work suggests that the virus alters leaf carbon metabolism prior to emergence of visible symptoms. Therefore, diurnal and seasonal measurements were conducted to quantify changes in leaf carbon balance and to elucidate the chronology of symptom progression in leaves and fruit. Healthy and infected vines were assayed in a commercial vineyard during which leaf water relations, photosynthesis, and nonstructural carbohydrates were measured. Additionally, sugar and anthocyanin accumulation in the fruit were monitored at the end of the season to characterize the impact of the virus on ripening. Virus infection significantly reduced carbon assimilation pre- and postveraison, but the impact was more pronounced postveraison and during the afternoon when vine water status was the lowest. Similarly, virus infection significantly increased leaf starch concentration pre- and postveraison, but increased leaf starch in infected vines was detected two weeks prior to veraison. Virus infection had the greatest impact on obstructing leaf carbon export postveraison, especially during the afternoon. The virus had no impact on chlorophyll fluorescence, indicating there was no sustained photosystem impairment and suggesting that changes in chlorophyll fluorescence were a transient response to reduced carbon assimilation and export. This study provides evidence that reduced carbon export constitutes a feedback inhibition response to accumulation of leaf starch prior to the appearance of visible symptoms or impacts to ripening, which may aid earlier detection of the virus.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
2
Virology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
4
Journal of General Virology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
6
Plant Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
8
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
9
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
11
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
12
Plant Pathology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
15
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Virology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
18
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Virus Research
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
24
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
25
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%