Back

Repurposing Remdesivir for COVID-19: Computational Drug Design Targeting SARS-CoV-2 RNA Polymerase and Main Protease using Molecular Dynamics Approach

Shikder, M.; Ahmed, K. A.; Moin, A. T.; Patil, R. B.; Hasib, T. A.; Hossan, M. I.; Mahasin, D.; Sakib, M. N.; Ahmed, I.; Patel, H.; Chowdhury, A. S.

2023-06-16 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.06.15.545129 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) is a highly contagious respiratory illness that has become a global health crisis with new variants, an unprecedented number of infections, and deaths and demands urgent manufacturing of potent therapeutics. Despite the success of vaccination campaigns around the globe, there is no particular therapeutics approved to date for efficiently treating infected individuals. Repositioning or repurposing previously effective antivirals against RNA viruses to treat COVID-19 patients is a feasible option. Remdesivir is a broad-spectrum antiviral drug that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) licenses for treating COVID-19 patients who are critically ill patients. Remdesivirs low efficacy, which has been shown in some clinical trials, possible adverse effects, and dose-related toxicities are issues with its use in clinical use. Our study aimed to design potent derivatives of remdesivir through the functional group modification of the parent drug targeting RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and main protease (MPro) of SARS-CoV-2. The efficacy and stability of the proposed derivatives were assessed by molecular docking and extended molecular dynamics simulation analyses. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetic activity was measured to ensure the safety and drug potential of the designed derivatives. The derivatives were non-carcinogenic, chemically reactive, highly interactive, and stable with the target proteins. D-CF3 is one of the designed derivatives that finally showed stronger interaction than the parent drug, according to the docking and dynamics simulation analyses, with both target proteins. However, in vitro and in vivo investigations are guaranteed to validate the findings in the future.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.9%
2
Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.7%
4
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
5
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
6
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.2%
8
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
9
Molecules
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.2%
11
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
76 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
12
Computational Biology and Chemistry
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
RSC Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
15
Pharmaceuticals
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
21
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
European Journal of Pharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%