Back

The critical role of spatio-temporal control in combinatorial chemo- and magnetic hyperthermia thermo-therapy: 'the where', 'the how' and 'the when'

Garcia-Hevia, L.; Magalhaes, A. P.; Genicio, N.; Casafont, I.; Costa da Silva, M.; Lopez Fanarraga, M.; Banobre-Lopez, M.; Gallo, J.

2023-06-15 biochemistry
10.1101/2023.06.15.545102 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Combinatorial treatments hold the key to the future of cancer treatment as they enhance therapeutic indexes by inducing synergistic effects and reducing resistance processes, while often providing a safer option for patients with fewer off-target effects. However, combinatorial treatments bring extra problems to cancer management not only derived from the actual compatibility of the treatments, but also from their hands-on administration. Operational parameters such as administration order and dosing (dose, spacing) have to be optimized in order to positively impact patient prognosis. Here we present a systematic study on the optimization and the importance of these parameters within the framework of a combinatorial chemo-/thermo-therapy. Parameters like where, how and when are investigated in detail. Furthermore, we delve into the underlying biochemical mechanisms driving the observed effects through transcriptome analysis.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Pharmaceutics
○ 24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 8%
7.5%
Similar papers in this journal
3
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
● 37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Nanoscale
● 42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Cancers
○ 213 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
Similar papers in this journal
6
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.4%
7
ChemBioChem
○ 55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
8
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
○ 494 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.3%
9
Materials Today Bio
○ 20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
10
Advanced Functional Materials
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
11
ACS Omega
● 105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Nanoscale Advances
● 15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.7%
14
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
ACS Applied Bio Materials
● 24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
16
FEBS Open Bio
○ 31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
17
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
● 39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
18
Bioconjugate Chemistry
● 20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.2%
20
Journal of Controlled Release
○ 44 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
21
Cells
○ 249 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
22
Biomaterials Science
● 24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
23
Talanta
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
24
Biomaterials
○ 84 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Photoacoustics
○ 12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
26
ACS Nano
● 113 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
28
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
● 36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
29
Physics of Fluids
● 13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%
30
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
○ 42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.