Deep Learning in Automating Breast Cancer Diagnosis from Microscopy Images
Gu, Q.; Prodduturi, N.; Hart, S. N.
Show abstract
ContextBreast cancer is one of the most common cancers in women. With early diagnosis, some breast cancers are highly curable. However, the concordance rate of breast cancer diagnosis from histology slides by pathologists is unacceptably low. Classifying normal versus tumor breast tissues from microscopy images of breast histology is an ideal case to use for deep learning and could help to more reproducibly diagnose breast cancer. Since data preprocessing and hyperparameter configurations have impacts on breast cancer classification accuracies of deep learning models, training a deep learning classifier with appropriate data preprocessing approaches and optimized hyperparameter configurations could improve breast cancer classification accuracy. Methods and MaterialUsing 12 combinations of deep learning model architectures (i.e., including 5 non-specialized and 7 digital pathology-specialized model architectures), image data preprocessing, and hyperparameter configurations, the validation accuracy of tumor versus normal classification were calculated using the BreAst Cancer Histology (BACH) dataset. ResultsThe DenseNet201, a non-specialized model architecture, with transfer learning approach achieved 98.61% validation accuracy compared to only 64.00% for the digital pathology-specialized model architecture. ConclusionsThe combination of image data preprocessing approaches and hyperparameter configurations have a profound impact on the performance of deep neural networks for image classification. To identify a well-performing deep neural network to classify tumor versus normal breast histology, researchers should not only focus on developing new models specifically for digital pathology, since hyperparameter tuning for existing deep neural networks in the computer vision field could also achieve a high (often better) prediction accuracy.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using an Anomaly Detection Approach for the Segmentation of Colorectal Cancer Tumors in Whole Slide Images 95%
- Independent assessment of a deep learning system for lymph node metastasis detection on the Augmented Reality Microscope 95%
- A tool for federated training of segmentation models on whole slide images. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- ARA: accurate, reliable and active histopathological image classification framework with Bayesian deep learning 96%
- Aggregation of Cohorts for Histopathological Diagnosis with Deep Morphological Analysis 96%
- Generating synthetic data in digital pathology through diffusion models: a multifaceted approach to evaluation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep learning models for poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma classification in whole slide images using transfer learning 95%
- A Machine Learning Ensemble Based on Radiomics to Predict BI-RADS Category and Reduce the Biopsy Rate of Ultrasound-Detected Suspicious Breast Masses 93%
- An Explainable Web-Based Diagnostic System for Alzheimer's Disease Using XRAI and Deep Learning on Brain MRI 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection of Colorectal Adenocarcinoma and Grading Dysplasia on Histopathologic Slides Using Deep Learning 95%
- Non-Metastatic Axillary Lymph Nodes Have Distinct Morphology and Immunophenotype in Obese Breast Cancer patients at Risk for Metastasis 92%
- Computer Vision Identifies Recurrent and Non-Recurrent Ductal Carcinoma in situ Lesions with Special Emphasis on African American Women 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Weakly supervised learning for multi-organ adenocarcinoma classification in whole slide images 95%
- Identifying Transcriptomic Correlates of Histology using Deep Learning 94%
- FalseColor-Python: a rapid intensity-leveling and digital-staining package for fluorescence-based slide-free digital pathology 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.