Protocol for piloting a phone-based web survey to elicit barriers to accessing triage camps within community-based, Peek-powered eye screening programmes.
Allen, L.; Mishra, S. K.; Tlhajoane, M.; Ratshaa, B.; Mcleod, D.; Chroston, H.; Nkomazana, O.; Bastawrous, A.
Show abstract
Pilot study summaryO_ST_ABSTitleC_ST_ABSPiloting a phone-based web survey to elicit barriers to accessing triage camps within community-based, Peek-powered eye screening programmes DesignPilot test of an online survey sent via SMS to 1,600 parents/guardians of children who did not attend eye clinics having been found to have an eye need at school screening. We will perform the same pilot twice; once in Botswana and once in Nepal AimsTo quantify the response rate among 16 different subgroups of recipients according to gender, location, wealth and assets. Note that we are not concerned with the responses at this pilot phase - only the suitability of the medium. PopulationParents/guardians of children who did not attend screening within Botswanas Peek-powered national school-based Pono Yame programme, and participants in Nepals Peek-powered community screening programme InterventionA four-question online survey exploring barriers to attendance. The hyperlink will be sent via SMS. Non-responders will receive a single follow-up reminder 7 days later. Outcome measureCumulative survey completion rates over the 31 days that follow the original SMS invitation. DurationAll survey invitations will be sent on the same day. As such, the pilot will last 31 days.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding The Impact, Reach and Implementation of a Health Systems Intervention to Improve Diabetes and Hypertension Care in Pluralistic Urban Public Primary Care in Bangladesh: A Study Protocol 93%
- Understanding preferences for self-sampling in a national cervical screening programme: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment 92%
- Challenges and facilitators in pathways to cancer diagnosis in Southern Africa: A qualitative study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors Affecting Guardians’ Decision Making on Clinic-based Purchase of Children’s Spectacles in Nigeria 94%
- Knowledge and Awareness-based Survey of COVID-19 within the Eye Care Profession in Nepal: Misinformation is Hiding the Truth. 94%
- Prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in Kogi state, Nigeria – Findings from a Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness survey 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Socioeconomic and demographic patterning of family uptake of a paediatric electronic patient portal innovation 93%
- Views and experiences of young people on using mHealth platforms for sexual and reproductive health services in rural low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic review 92%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- ReachUHC: A randomized controlled trial study protocol of a mobile phone-based reminder and automatic renewal intervention to increase health insurance renewal rates in Kumasi, Ghana 92%
- Evaluating implementation of LEAPS, a youth-led early childhood care and education intervention in rural Pakistan: protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial 92%
- Development and evaluation of rapid data-enabled access to routine clinical information to enhance early recruitment to the national clinical platform trial of COVID-19 community treatments 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the impact of Covid-19 on Nurturing Care in Nairobi Slums: Findings from 5 rounds of cross-sectional telephone surveys 92%
- An evaluation of the introduction of telehealth for remote antenatal and postnatal contacts in Bangladesh and Lao People’s Democratic Republic during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.