Back

A deep-learning workflow to predict upper tract urothelial cancer subtypes supporting the prioritization of patients for molecular testing

Angeloni, M.; van Doeveren, T.; Lindner, S.; Volland, P.; Schmelmer, J.; Foersch, S.; Matek, C.; Stoehr, R.; Geppert, C. I.; Heers, H.; Wach, S.; Taubert, H.; Sikic, D.; Wullich, B.; van Leenders, G. J.; Zaburdaev, V.; Eckstein, M.; Hartmann, A.; Boormans, J. L.; Ferrazzi, F.; Bahlinger, V.

2023-06-22 urology
10.1101/2023.06.14.23291350 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundUrothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UBC) comprises several molecular subtypes, which are associated with different targetable therapeutic options. However, if and how these associations extend to the rare upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains unclear. ObjectiveIdentifying UTUC protein-based subtypes and developing a deep-learning (DL) workflow to predict these subtypes directly from histopathological H&E slides. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsSubtypes in a retrospective cohort of 163 invasive samples were assigned on the basis of the immunohistochemical expression of three luminal (FOXA1, GATA3, CK20) and three basal (CD44, CK5, CK14) markers. DL model building relied on a transfer-learning approach. Outcome Measurements and Statistical AnalysisClassification performance was measured via repeated cross-validation, including assessment of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). The association of the predicted subtypes with histological features, PD-L1 status, and FGFR3 mutation was investigated. Results and LimitationsDistinctive luminal and basal subtypes were identified and could be successfully predicted by the DL (AUROC 95th CI: 0.62-0.99). Predictions showed morphology as well as presence of FGFR3-mutations and PD-L1 positivity that were consistent with the predicted subtype. Testing of the DL model on an independent cohort highlighted the importance to accommodate histological subtypes. ConclusionsOur DL workflow is able to predict protein-based UTUC subtypes directly from H&E slides. Furthermore, the predicted subtypes associate with the presence of targetable genetic alterations. Patient SummaryUTUC is an aggressive, yet understudied, disease. Here, we present an artificial intelligence algorithm that can predict UTUC subtypes directly from routine histopathological slides and support the identification of patients that may benefit from targeted therapy.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.7%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.5%
4
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
5
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
6
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.5%
9
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
11
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
15
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
17
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
18
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
19
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
20
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
22
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.8%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%