Modeling soybean growth: A mixed model approach
DELATTRE, M.; Toda, Y.; Tressou, J.; Iwata, H.
Show abstract
The evaluation of plant and animal growth, separately for genetic and environmental effects, is necessary for genetic understanding and genetic improvement of environmental responses of plants and animals. We propose to extend an existing approach that combines nonlinear mixed-effects model (NLMEM) and the stochastic approximation of the Expectation-Maximization algorithm (SAEM) to analyze genetic and environmental effects on plant growth. These tools are widely used in many fields but very rarely in plant biology. During model formulation, a nonlinear function describes the shape of growth, and random effects describe genetic and environmental effects and their variability. Genetic relationships among the varieties were also integrated into the model using a genetic relationship matrix. The SAEM algorithm was chosen as an efficient alternative to MCMC methods, which are more commonly used in the domain. It was implemented to infer the expected growth patterns in the analyzed population and the expected curves for each variety through a maximum-likelihood and a maximum-a-posteriori approaches, respectively. The obtained estimates can be used to predict the growth curves for each variety. We illustrate the strengths of the proposed approach using simulated data and soybean plant growth data obtained from a soybean cultivation experiment conducted at the Arid Land Research Center, Tottori University. In this experiment, plant height was measured daily using drones, and the growth was monitored for approximately 200 soybean cultivars for which whole-genome sequence data were available. The NLMEM approach improved our understanding of the determinants of soybean growth and can be successfully used for the genomic prediction of growth pattern characteristics. Author summaryNonlinear models are useful for modeling animal and plant growth; however, their parameters are influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. If the same model can be applied to data with different genetic and environmental factors by allowing parameter variations, it can be used to understand, predict, and control the genetic and environmental influences of growth models based on parameter variation. In this study, we propose a statistical method based on nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. The simulation and real data analysis results show that the proposed method was effective in modeling the growth of genetically different soybean varieties under different drought conditions. The usefulness of the proposed method is expected to increase, as high-throughput measurements provide growth data for a large number of genotypes in various environments.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- BWGS: a R package for genomic selection and its application to a wheat breeding programme. 95%
- Multi-trait random regression models increase genomic prediction accuracy for a temporal physiological trait derived from high-throughput phenotyping 94%
- New genotypic adaptability and stability analyses using Legendre polynomials and genotype-ideotype distances 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Incorporating A Dynamic Gene-Based Process Module Into A Crop Simulation Model 95%
- Development and calibration of the FSPM CPlantBox to represent the interactions between water and carbon fluxes in the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum 94%
- Improved Ensemble Performance by Weight Optimisation for the Genomic Prediction of Maize Flowering Time Traits 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- EnvRtype: a software to interplay enviromics and quantitative genomics in agriculture 95%
- A Multiple-trait Bayesian Variable Selection Regression Method for Integrating Phenotypic Causal Networks in Genome-Wide Association Studies 94%
- Heuristic hyperparameter optimization of deep learning models for genomic prediction 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.