Combined direct/indirect detection allows identification of DNA termini in diverse sequencing datasets and supports a multiple-initiation-site model for HIV plus-strand synthesis
Wang, W.; Artiles, K. L.; Machida, S.; Benkirane, M.; Jain, N.; Fire, A.
Show abstract
Replication of genetic material involves the creation of characteristic termini. Determining these termini is important to refine our understanding of the mechanisms involved in maintaining the genomes of cellular organisms and viruses. Here we describe a computational approach combining direct and indirect readouts to detect termini from next-generation short-read sequencing. While a direct inference of termini can come from mapping the most prominent start positions of captured DNA fragments, this approach is insufficient in cases where the DNA termini are not captured, whether for biological or technical reasons. Thus, a complementary (indirect) approach to terminus detection can be applied, taking advantage of the imbalance in coverage between forward and reverse sequence reads near termini. A resulting metric ("strand bias") can be used to detect termini even where termini are naturally blocked from capture or ends are not captured during library preparation (e.g., in tagmentation-based protocols). Applying this analysis to datasets where known DNA termini are present, such as from linear double-stranded viral genomes, yielded distinct strand bias signals corresponding to these termini. To evaluate the potential to analyze a more complex situation, we applied the analysis to examine DNA termini present early after HIV infection in a cell culture model. We observed both the known termini expected based on standard models of HIV reverse transcription (the U5-right-end and U3-left-end termini) as well as a signal corresponding to a previously described additional initiation site for plus-strand synthesis (cPPT [central polypurine tract]). Interestingly, we also detected putative terminus signals at additional sites. The strongest of these are a set that share several characteristics with the previously characterized plus-strand initiation sites (the cPPT and 3 PPT [polypurine tract] sites): (i) an observed spike in directly captured cDNA ends, an indirect terminus signal evident in localized strand bias, (iii) a preference for location on the plus-strand, (iv) an upstream purine-rich motif, and (v) a decrease in terminus signal at late time points after infection. These characteristics are consistent in duplicate samples in two different genotypes (wild type and integrase-lacking HIV). The observation of distinct internal termini associated with multiple purine-rich regions raises a possibility that multiple internal initiations of plus-strand synthesis might contribute to HIV replication.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- ConSeqUMI, an error-free nanopore sequencing pipeline to identify and extract individual nucleic acid molecules from heterogeneous samples 95%
- Unlocking the Full Potential of Nanopore Sequencing: Tips, Tricks, and Advanced Data Analysis Techniques 94%
- Selective Ablation of 3' RNA ends and Processive RTs Facilitate Direct cDNA Sequencing of Full-length Host Cell and Viral Transcripts 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- High-resolution HIV-1 m6A epitranscriptome reveals isoform-dependent methylation clusters and unique 2-LTR transcript modifications 93%
- svCapture: Efficient and specific detection of very low frequency structural variant junctions by error-minimized capture sequencing 92%
- Tailored machine learning models for functional RNA detection in genome-wide screens 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- High-throughput Kinetics using Capillary Electrophoresis and Robotics (HiKER) platform used to Study T7, T3, and Sp6 RNA Polymerase Misincorporation 94%
- Translesion Synthesis by MmLV-, AMV-, and HIV-Reverse Transcriptases Using RNA Templates Containing Inosine, Guanosine, and Their 8-oxo-7,8-Dihydropurine Derivatives. 93%
- Predicting CRISPR-Cas12a guide efficiency for targeting using Machine Learning 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.