Back

Improved Production of Taxol(R) Precursors in S. cerevisiae using Combinatorial in silico Design and Metabolic Engineering

MALCI, K.; Santibanez, R.; Jonguitud-Borrego, N.; Santoyo-Garcia, J. H.; Kherkoven, E. J.; Rios Solis, L.

2023-06-11 synthetic biology
10.1101/2023.06.11.544475 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Integrated metabolic engineering approaches combining system and synthetic biology tools allow the efficient designing of microbial cell factories to synthesize high-value products. In the present study, in silico design algorithms were used on the latest yeast genome-scale model 8.5.0 to predict potential genomic modifications that could enhance the production of early-step Taxol(R) in previously engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. The solution set containing genomic modification candidates was narrowed down by employing the COnstraints Based Reconstruction and Analysis (COBRA) methods. 17 genomic modifications consisting of nine gene deletions and eight gene overexpression were screened using wet-lab studies to determine whether these modifications can increase the production yield of taxadiene, the first metabolite in the Taxol(R) through the mevalonate pathway. Depending on the cultivation condition, most of the single genomic modifications resulted in higher taxadiene production. The best-performing strain, named KM32, contained four overexpressed genes, ILV2, TRR1, ADE13 and ECM31, from the branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis, thioredoxin system, de novo purine synthesis, and the pantothenate pathway, respectively. Using KM32, taxadiene production was increased by 50%, reaching 215 mg/L of taxadiene. The engineered strain also produced 43.65 mg/L of taxa-4(20),11-dien-5-ol (T5-ol), and 26.2 mg/L of taxa-4(20),11-dien-5--yl acetate (T5Ac) which are the highest productions of these early-step Taxol(R) metabolites reported until now in S. cerevisiae. The findings of this study highlight that the use of computational and integrated approaches can ensure determining promising modifications that are difficult to estimate intuitively to develop yeast cell factories.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.8%
2
Metabolic Engineering
68 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
3
Metabolic Engineering Communications
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
5
Biotechnology for Biofuels
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Microbial Cell Factories
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
8
Bioresource Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
9
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
10
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
13
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
15
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
17
ChemBioChem
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
19
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
20
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%