Characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 at high risk of disease progression receiving sotrovimab, oral antivirals or no treatment in Scotland
Drysdale, M.; Tibble, H.; Patel, V.; Gibbons, D. C.; Lloyd, E.; Kerr, W.; Macdonald, C.; Birch, H.; Sheikh, A.
Show abstract
IntroductionSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is constantly evolving. The clinical benefit of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatments against new circulating variants remains unclear. We sought to describe the real-world use of, and clinical outcomes associated with, early COVID-19 treatments among non-hospitalised patients with COVID-19 at highest risk of developing severe disease in Scotland. MethodsRetrospective cohort study of non-hospitalised patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from 1 December 2021 to 25 October 2022, using administrative health data managed by Public Health Scotland and National Records of Scotland. Patients included in the study were aged [≥]18 years, met at least one of the National Health Service highest-risk conditions criteria for early COVID-19 treatment, and had received outpatient treatment with sotrovimab, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir, or no early COVID-19 treatment. Index date was defined as the earliest of either COVID-19-positive diagnosis or early COVID-19 treatment during the study period. Baseline patient characteristics and acute clinical outcomes in the 28 days following the index date were reported. To protect patient confidentiality, values of [≤]5 were suppressed. ResultsA total of 2548 patients were included (492: sotrovimab, 276: nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, 71: molnupiravir, and 1709 eligible highest-risk untreated). Patients aged [≥]75 years accounted for 6.9% (n=34/492) of the sotrovimab-treated group, 21.0% (n=58/276) of those treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, 16.9% (n=12/71) of those treated with molnupiravir and 13.2% (n=225/1709) of untreated patients. Advanced renal disease was reported for 6.7% (n=33/492) of sotrovimab-treated and 4.7% (n=81/1709) of untreated patients, and five or fewer patients in the nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir cohorts. A high proportion of treated patients did not have a highest-risk condition reported in the database (71.7% for sotrovimab [n=353/492], 85.1% for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir [n=235/276], 85.9% for molnupiravir [n=61/71]). Five or fewer patients in each treated cohort experienced COVID-19-related hospitalisations during the 28-day acute period. For untreated patients, the percentage of COVID-19-related hospitalisations was 3.0% (n=48/1622). All-cause hospitalisations were experienced by 5.3% (n=25/476) of sotrovimab-treated patients, 6.9% (n=12/175) of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir-treated patients and 13.3% (n=216/1622) of untreated patients. Five or fewer patients in the molnupiravir cohort experienced all-cause hospitalisation. There were no deaths within 28 days of index for patients in the treated cohorts. Mortality was 4.3% (n=70/1622) in untreated patients (18.6% [n=13/70] had COVID-19 as the primary cause). In our analyses of outcomes for sotrovimab-treated and untreated patients during BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5 predominance, COVID-19-related hospitalisation rates were consistent, with n[≤]5 for sotrovimab-treated patients in each period. ConclusionsOur findings indicate that sotrovimab was often used amongst patients who were aged <75 years old and had advanced renal disease. Among patients who received early COVID-19 treatment, proportions of all-cause hospitalisation and death within 28 days of treatment were low.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world effectiveness of molnupiravir, nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, and sotrovimab on preventing hospital admission among higher-risk patients with COVID-19 in Wales: a retrospective cohort study 98%
- The safety of antivirals and neutralising monoclonal antibodies used in prehospital treatment of Covid-19 95%
- Tixagevimab-cilgavimab (AZD7442) for the treatment of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (DisCoVeRy): A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of Post-COVID Conditions among adolescents and adults who received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for acute COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study 95%
- Intramuscular Versus Intravenous SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Sotrovimab for Treatment of COVID-19 (COMET-TAIL): A Randomized Non-inferiority Clinical Trial 93%
- Safety, Virology, Pharmacokinetics, and Clinical Experience of High-dose Intravenous Sotrovimab for the Treatment of Mild to Moderate COVID-19: An Open-label Clinical Trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in fluoroquinolone prescribing in UK primary and secondary care between 2019 and 2023 92%
- Optimal dose and safety of molnupiravir in patients with early SARS-CoV-2: a phase 1, dose-escalating, randomised controlled study 92%
- General practice antibiotic prescriptions attributable to Respiratory Syncytial Virus by age and antibiotic class: An ecological analysis of the English population 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world effectiveness of molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir against mortality, hospitalization, and in-hospital outcomes among community-dwelling, ambulatory COVID-19 patients during the BA.2.2 wave in Hong Kong: an observational study 95%
- Antivirals for post-exposure prophylaxis of influenza: a systematic review and network meta-analysis 90%
- Ethnic differences in COVID-19 infection, hospitalisation, and mortality: an OpenSAFELY analysis of 17 million adults in England 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-World Effectiveness Of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir On COVID-19-Associated Hospitalization Prevention: A Population-Based Cohort Study In The Province Of Québec, Canada 95%
- Outcomes of COVID-19 related hospitalisation among people with HIV in the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol UK Protocol: prospective observational study 93%
- Compassionate Use of REGEN-COV ® in Patients with COVID-19 and Immunodeficiency-Associated Antibody Disorders 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.