Back

User adherence and perceptions of a Volunteer-Led Telemonitoring and Teleorientation Service for COVID-19 community management in Peru: The COVIDA project

Escobar-Agreda, S.; Silva-Valencia, J.; Soto-Becerra, P.; Reategui-Rivera, C. M.; De la Cruz-Torralva, K.; Chahuara-Rojas, M.; Hernandez-Iriarte, B.; Espinoza-Herrera, D. H.; Delgado, C. A.; Matassini Eyzaguirre, S. M.; Vargas-Herrera, J. R.; Rojas-Mezarina, L.

2023-06-12 health informatics
10.1101/2023.06.08.23291037 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDuring the pandemic in Peru, the COVIDA project proposed an innovative way to provide telemonitoring and teleorientation to COVID-19 pandemics led by health student volunteers. However, it has not been described how this interaction is perceived from the users perspective. The aim of this study is to describe the adherence and perceptions of users about COVIDA. MethodsA mixed-method study was conducted to evaluate the adherence and perceptions of COVIDA users. This telehealth intervention implemented in Peru from August to December 2020 involved daily phone-calls by volunteer students to monitor registered users for 14 days or until a warning sign was identified. The volunteers also provided teleorientation to address the users needs and concerns. Quantitative analysis described the characteristics of users and assessed the factors related to adherence to the service. Qualitative analysis trough semi-structured interviews evaluated the users perceptions about the service. ResultsOf the 778 users enrolled in COVIDA, 397 (54.7%) were female and had a mean age of 41 years (SD: 15.3). During the monitoring, 380 users (44.4%) developed symptoms, and 471 (55.5%) showed warning signs for COVID-19. The overall median of adherence was 93% (p25:36%, p75:100%). Among those users who did not develop warning symptoms, a high level of adherence (>66%) was seen predominantly in users that developed symptoms and those with a positive COVID-19 test (p<0.05). Users referred that the information provided by volunteers was clear and valuable and, their accompaniment provided them with emotional support. Communications via phone calls were developed fluently without interruptions. ConclusionsCOVIDA represented an affordable, well-accepted, and perceived alternative model for telemonitoring, teleorientation and emotional support from student volunteers to users with diseases such as COVID-19 in a context of overwhelmed demand for healthcare services.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
17.6%
3
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
6
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
7
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
8
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
9
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
10
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
12
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
13
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
14
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
15
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
16
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
17
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
23
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 80%
0.5%