Traditional surveys versus ecological momentary assessments: digital citizen science approaches to improve ethical physical activity surveillance among youth
Ibrahim, S.; Hammami, N.; Katapally, T. R.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe role of physical activity (PA) in minimizing non-communicable diseases is well established. Measurement bias can be reduced via ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) deployed via citizen-owned smartphones. This study aims to engage citizen scientists to understand how PA reported digitally by retrospective and prospective measures varies within the same cohort. MethodsThis study used the digital citizen science approach to collaborate with citizen scientists, aged 13-21 years over eight consecutive days via a custom-built app. Citizen scientists were recruited through schools in Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada in 2018 (August 31 - December 31). Retrospective PA was assessed through a survey, which was adapted from three validated PA surveys to suit smartphone-based data collection, and prospective PA was assessed through time-triggered EMAs deployed consecutively every day, from day 1 to day 8, including weekdays and weekends. Data analyses included t-test to understand the difference in PA reported retrospectively and prospectively, and linear regressions to assess contextual and demographic factors associated with PA reported retrospectively and prospectively. ResultFindings showed a significant difference between PA reported retrospectively and prospectively (p = 0.001). Ethnicity (visible minorities: {beta} = - 0.911, 95% C.I.= -1.677, -0.146), parental education (university: {beta} = 0.978, 95% C.I.= 0.308, 1.649), and strength training (at least one day: {beta} = 0.932, 95% C.I.= 0.108, 1.755) were associated with PA reported prospectively. In contrast, the number of active friends (at least one friend: {beta} = 0.741, 95% C.I.= 0.026, 1.458) was associated with retrospective PA. ConclusionPhysical inactivity is the fourth leading cause of mortality globally, which requires accurate monitoring to inform population health interventions. In this digital age, where ubiquitous devices provide real-time engagement capabilities, digital citizen science can transform how we measure behaviours using citizen-owned ubiquitous digital tools to support prevention and treatment of non-communicable diseases. Author summaryTraditionally, the surveillance of physical activity has been predominantly conducted with retrospective surveys that require participants to recall behaviours, a methodology which has significant challenges due to measurement bias. With advances in digital technology, ubiquitous devices offer a solution through ecological momentary assessments (EMAs). Using the Smart Framework, which combines citizen science with community-based participatory research, this study ethically obtained retrospective and prospective EMA physical activity data from the same cohort of youth citizen scientists, who used their own smartphones to engage with our team over an eight-day period. The findings show a significant difference between physical activity reported through retrospective and prospective EMAs. Moreover, there was also a variation between contextual and demographic factors that were associated with retrospective and prospective physical activity - evidence that points towards the need to adapt physical activity surveillance in the digital age by ethically engaging with citizens via their own ubiquitous digital devices.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- To what extent does self-reported physical activity impact children’s wellbeing and mental health? Insights from School-Aged Children in Wales 96%
- A Mental Health Paradox: Mental health was both a motivator and barrier to physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Using a design-based research approach to develop a technology-supported physical education course to increase the physical activity levels of university students: Study protocol paper 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Wireless physical activity monitor use among adults living with HIV in a community-based exercise intervention study: a quantitative longitudinal observational study 95%
- Correlates of and changes in aerobic physical activity and strength training before and after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic in the UK – findings from the HEBECO study 94%
- Taking a participatory research approach within workplace health promotion research to improve physical activity levels in office-based workers: a scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Physical Activity Behaviour in Middle-Aged and Older Canadian Women and Men: An Analysis of the CLSA 94%
- How is the COVID-19 pandemic impacting our life, mental health, and well-being? Design and preliminary findings of the pan-Canadian longitudinal COHESION Study 94%
- Characterization of Trajectories of Physical Activity and Cigarette Smoking from Early Adolescence to Adulthood 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- How can digital citizen science approaches improve ethical smartphone use surveillance among youth: traditional surveys versus ecological momentary assessments 98%
- Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an online mindful walking intervention among COVID-19 long haulers: A mixed method study including daily diary surveys 95%
- Exploring perspectives on digital smoking cessation just-in-time adaptive interventions: A focus group study with adult smokers and smoking cessation professionals 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Practical recommendations for staying physically active during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review 94%
- Variability in physical inactivity responses of university students during COVID-19 pandemic: A monitoring of daily step counts using a smartphone application 94%
- Impostor Phenomenon in the Nutrition and Dietetics Profession: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.