Improving patient clustering by incorporating structured label relationships in similarity measures
LAMBERT, J.; Leutenegger, A.-L.; Baudot, A.; Jannot, A.-S.
Show abstract
ContextPatient stratification is the cornerstone of numerous health studies, serving to enhance medicine efficacy estimation and facilitate patient matching. To stratify patients, similarity measured between patients can be computed from medical health records databases, such as medico-administrative databases. Importantly, the variables included in medico-administrative databases can be associated with labels, which can be organized in ontologies or other classification systems. However, to the best of our knowledge, the relevance of considering such label classification in the computation of patient similarity measures has been poorly studied. ObjectiveWe propose and evaluate several weighted versions of the Cosine similarity that consider structured label relationships to compute patient similarities from a medico-administrative database. Material and MethodsAs a use case, we analyze medicine reimbursements contained in the Echantillon Generaliste des Beneficiaires, a French medico-administrative database. We compute the standard Cosine similarity between patients based on their medicine reimbursement. In addition, we computed a weighted Cosine similarity measure that includes variable frequencies and two weighted Cosine similarity measures that consider label relationships. We construct patient networks from each similarity measure and identify clusters of patients. We evaluate the performance of the different similarity measures with enrichment tests using information on chronic diseases. ResultsThe similarity measures that include label relationships perform better to identify similar patients. Indeed, using these weighted measures, we identify distinct patient clusters with a higher number of chronic disease enrichments as compared to the other measures. Importantly, the enrichment tests provide clinically interpretable insights into these patient clusters. ConclusionConsidering label relationships when computing patient similarities improves stratification of patients regarding their health status.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Graph-Based Clinical Recommender: Predicting Specialists Procedure Orders using Graph Representation Learning 94%
- Mining for Equitable Health: Assessing the Impact of Missing Data in Electronic Health Records 93%
- Using computable knowledge mined from the literature to elucidate confounders for EHR-based pharmacovigilance 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- PathWalks: Identifying pathway communities using a disease-related map of integrated information 94%
- Integration of multi-source gene interaction networks and omics data with graph attention networks to identify novel disease genes 94%
- Multi-omics Data Integration by Generative Adversarial Network 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Graph Neural Network Modelling as a potentially effective Method for predicting and analyzing Procedures based on Patient Diagnoses 95%
- Enriching Representation Learning Using 53 Million Patient Notes through Human Phenotype Ontology Embedding 94%
- Stability of feature selection utilizing Graph Convolutional Neural Network and Layer-wise Relevance Propagation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- COHD-COVID: Columbia Open Health Data for COVID-19 Research 94%
- Structured Codes and Free-Text Notes: Measuring Information Complementarity in Electronic Health Records 93%
- Predicting Emerging Themes in Rapidly Expanding COVID-19 Literature with Dynamic Word Embedding Networks and Machine Learning 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.