Back

Graph representations of iEEG data for seizure detection with graph neural networks

Diaz-Montiel, A. A.; Lankarany, M.

2023-06-05 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.06.02.543277 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Epilepsy is a neurological disorder that affects over 50 million individuals worldwide. Today, the gold-standard treatment for those who are drug resistant, meaning that symptoms cannot be controlled with medication, is to surgically remove the seizure onset zone (SOZ), the area of the brain believed to cause seizures: the main symptom of epilepsy. Unfortunately, around 50% of drug resistant patients are not resective candidates, which can be attributed in part to poor SOZ localization. SOZ localization is a complex and lengthy procedure, requiring visual inspection and manual processing by human experts that first need to localize and isolate seizure events. The intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) is a tool that records electrophysiological activity of the inner brain at different regions and depths, and provides critical information on the SOZ. However, iEEG data processing methodologies are not standardized, and practice and resources vary across hospitals and clinics. To assist human experts with systematic processing of iEEG data, we propose a data processing pipeline that generates graph representations of iEEG data. We evaluate 9 different graph representations of publicly available iEEG data from 25 patients with epilepsy with a graph neural network model trained to detect seizures. Our results suggest that graph representations of iEEG data that leverage electrode and functional connectivity features are powerful data structures to analyze and interpret iEEG data in the context of epilepsy. We anticipate that our data pipeline that provides a systematic processing of neural data with graphs can integrate other data modalities like neuroimaging data. Moreover, methods used in the data pipeline have potentials to apply to other neurological disorders such as Parkinsons disease or major depression disorder.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.9%
2
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
3
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.5%
8
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 9%
4.0%
10
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
11
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
12
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
17
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
19
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
20
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Neural Networks
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
25
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%