Back

Utilizing Aggregated Molecular Phenotype (AMP) Scores to Visualize Simultaneous Molecular Changes in Mass Spectrometry Imaging Data

Chappel, J. R.; King, M. E.; Fleming, J.; Eberlin, L. S.; Reif, D. M.; Baker, E.

2023-06-05 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.06.01.543306 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) has gained increasing popularity for tissue-based diagnostics due to its ability to identify and visualize molecular characteristics unique to different phenotypes within heterogeneous samples. Data from MSI experiments are often visualized using single ion images and further analyzed using machine learning and multivariate statistics to identify m/z features of interest and create predictive models for phenotypic classification. However, often only a single molecule or m/z feature is visualized per ion image, and mainly categorical classifications are provided from the predictive models. As an alternative approach, we developed an aggregated molecular phenotype (AMP) scoring system. AMP scores are generated using an ensemble machine learning approach to first select features differentiating phenotypes, weight the features using logistic regression, and combine the weights and feature abundances. AMP scores are then scaled between 0 and 1, with lower values generally corresponding to class 1 phenotypes (typically control) and higher scores relating to class 2 phenotypes. AMP scores therefore allow the evaluation of multiple features simultaneously and showcase the degree to which these features correlate with various phenotypes, leading to high diagnostic accuracy and interpretability of predictive models. Here, AMP score performance was evaluated using metabolomic data collected from desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) MSI. Initial comparisons of cancerous human tissues to normal or benign counterparts illustrated that AMP scores distinguished phenotypes with high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Furthermore, when combined with spatial coordinates, AMP scores allow visualization of tissue sections in one map with distinguished phenotypic borders, highlighting their diagnostic utility.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.6%
2
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.9%
4
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
5
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
6
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
11
Journal of Proteomics
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.3%
16
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.1%
18
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
19
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
20
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
27
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Endocrinology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
29
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
30
Oncotarget
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%