Back

Post-COVID Orthopaedic Elective Resource Planning Using Simulation Modelling

Harper, A.; Monks, T.; Wilson, R.; Redaniel, M. T.; Eyles, E.; Jones, T.; Penfold, C.; Elliott, A.; Keen, T.; Pitt, M.; Blom, A.; Whitehouse, M.; Judge, A.

2023-06-05 orthopedics
10.1101/2023.05.31.23290774 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo develop a simulation model to support orthopaedic elective capacity planning. MethodsAn open-source, generalisable discrete-event simulation was developed, including a web-based application. The model used anonymised patient records between 2016-2019 of elective orthopaedic procedures from an NHS Trust in England. In this paper, it is used to investigate scenarios including resourcing (beds and theatres) and productivity (lengths-of-stay, delayed discharges, theatre activity) to support planning for meeting new NHS targets aimed at reducing elective orthopaedic surgical backlogs in a proposed ring fenced orthopaedic surgical facility. The simulation is interactive and intended for use by health service planners and clinicians. ResultsA higher number of beds (65-70) than the proposed number (40 beds) will be required if lengths-of-stay and delayed discharge rates remain unchanged. Reducing lengths-of-stay in line with national benchmarks reduces bed utilisation to an estimated 60%, allowing for additional theatre activity such as weekend working. Further, reducing the proportion of patients with a delayed discharge by 75% reduces bed utilisation to below 40%, even with weekend working. A range of other scenarios can also be investigated directly by NHS planners using the interactive web app. ConclusionsThe simulation model is intended to support capacity planning of orthopaedic elective services by identifying a balance of capacity across theatres and beds and predicting the impact of productivity measures on capacity requirements. It is applicable beyond the study site and can be adapted for other specialties. Strengths and Limitations of this studyO_LIThe simulation model provides rapid quantitative estimates to support post-COVID elective services recovery toward medium-term elective targets. C_LIO_LIParameter combinations include changes to both resourcing and productivity. C_LIO_LIThe interactive web app enables intuitive parameter changes by users while underlying source code can be adapted or re-used for similar applications. C_LIO_LIPatient attributes such as complexity are not included in the model but are reflected in variables such as length-of-stay and delayed discharge rates. C_LIO_LITheatre schedules are simplified, incorporating the five key orthopaedic elective surgical procedures. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
22.2%
3
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
5
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
6
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
7
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.3%
9
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
10
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
11
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
12
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
13
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
14
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
15
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%