Silicosis, tuberculosis and silica exposure among artisanal and small-scale miners: A systematic review and modelling paper
Howlett, P.; Mousa, H.; Said, B.; Mbuya, A.; Kon, O. M.; Feary, J.; Mpagama, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundAn estimated 44 million artisanal and small-scale miners (ASM), largely based in developing economies, face significant occupational risks for respiratory diseases. We aimed to review studies that describe silicosis and tuberculosis prevalence and respirable crystalline silica (RCS) exposures among ASM and use background evidence to attempt to understand the relationship between exposures and disease outcomes. MethodsWe searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Embase for studies published before the 24th March 2023. Our primary outcome of interest was silicosis or tuberculosis among ASM. Secondary outcomes included measurements of respirable dust or silica, spirometry and prevalence of respiratory symptoms. A systematic review and narrative synthesis was performed and risk of bias assessed using the Joanna Briggs Prevalence Critical Appraisal Tool. Logistic and Poisson regression models with predefined parameters were used to estimate silicosis prevalence and tuberculosis incidence at different distributions of cumulative silica exposure. ResultsWe identified 18 eligible studies that included 29,562 miners from 13 distinct populations in 10 countries. Silicosis prevalence ranged from 11 to 37%, despite four of five studies reporting an average median duration of mining of <6 years. Tuberculosis prevalence was high; microbiologically confirmed disease ranged from 1.8 to 12% and clinical disease 3.0 to 17%. Average RCS intensity was very high (range 0.19-89.5 mg/m3) and respiratory symptoms were common. Our modelling demonstrated decreases in RCS result in reductions in silicosis and tuberculosis, with greater effects at higher mean exposures. DiscussionDespite potential selection and measurement bias, prevalence of silicosis and tuberculosis were high in the studies identified in this review. Our modelling demonstrated the greatest respiratory health benefits of reducing RCS are in those with highest exposures. ASM face a high occupational respiratory disease burden which can be reduced by low-cost and effective reductions in RCS.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence and determinants of evidence of silicosis and impaired lung function, among small scale tanzanite miners and the peri-mining community in northern Tanzania 94%
- Within-country heterogeneity in patterns of social contact relevant for tuberculosis infection transmission, prevention, and care 92%
- Respiratory symptoms after coalmine fire and pandemic: a longitudinal analysis of the Hazelwood Health Study adult cohort 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exposure to Traffic-Related Air Pollution is Associated with Greater Bacterial Diversity in the Lower Respiratory Tract of Children 92%
- Arsenic exposure is associated with elevated sweat chloride concentration and airflow obstruction among adults in Bangladesh: a cross sectional study 91%
- Prenatal polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure and birth outcomes in a pregnancy cohort in Nairobi, Kenya. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Occupation, Work-Related Contact, and SARS-CoV-2 Anti-Nucleocapsid Serological Status: Findings from the Virus Watch prospective cohort study 91%
- Occupational and environmental exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in and around infected mink farms 91%
- Atopy, asthma symptoms, and eosinophilic airway inflammation in British woodworkers 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in adults exposed to fine particles from a coal mine fire 94%
- Long-term exposure to air pollution and risk of adult-onset asthma and COPD: Danish nationwide cohort study 90%
- Clinical utility of home versus hospital spirometry in fibrotic ILD: evaluation following INJUSTIS interim analysis 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.