Back

Advancing scaffold biomimicry: engineering mechanics in microfiber scaffolds with independently controlled architecture using melt electrowriting

Devlin, B. L.; Pickering, E.; Allenby, M. C.; Paxton, N. C.; Woodruff, M.

2023-05-30 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.05.28.542676 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Melt electrowriting (MEW) is an additive manufacturing technique characterized by its ability to fabricate micronscale fibers from molten polymers into highly controlled 3D microfiber scaffolds. This emerging technique is gaining traction in tissue engineering and biofabrication research, however limitations in the ability to develop advanced coding to program MEW printers to fabricate scaffolds with complex fiber architectures has inhibited the development of structures with tunable and biomimetic mechanical properties. This study reports a series of non-straight scaffold architectures with combinations of independently controlled X & Y fiber spacing, corrections for MEW jet lag, and characterizations of their influences on scaffold mechanics. Polycaprolactone scaffolds with an elastic modulus ranging from 0.3 to 7.3 MPa were fabricated utilizing scaffolds manufactured from 5 layers of 55 m fibers. The inclusion of scaffold design corrections in the gcode to compensate for decreasing deposition accuracy with increasing layer height enabled us to correct for discontinuous stress-strain mechanics and improved scaffold fabrication reproducibility. This study provides a comparison between a series of highly reproducible MEW scaffold architectures with non-straight fibers compared to the common crosshatch design to inform the development of more biomimetic scaffolds applicable to a variety of clinical applications. It further illustrates the significant effect toolpath correction has on reducing poor stress-strain mechanics, therefore improving the control, reproducibility, and biomimetic capacity of the MEW technique.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
3
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
4
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
5
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
8
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
10
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
12
Biomacromolecules
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
16
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
17
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
19
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
21
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
22
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%
24
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
26
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%