Back

Ovarian carcinoma patients with a tumor BRCA-like genomic copy number aberration profile benefit from maintenance olaparib/bevacizumab therapy in the PAOLA-1 randomized controlled trial.

Schouten, P. C.; Schmidt, S.; Becker, K.; Thiele, H.; Nurnberg, P.; Richters, L. K.; Ernst, C.; Treilleux, I.; Medioni, J.; Heitz, F.; Pisano, C.; Garcia, Y.; Petru, E.; Hietanen, S.; Colombo, N.; Vergote, I.; Nagao, S.; Linn, S. C.; Pujade-Lauraine, E.; Ray-Coquard, I.; Harter, P.; Hahnen, E.; Schmutzler, R. K.

2023-06-01 oncology
10.1101/2023.05.27.23290631 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWe previously established an ovarian carcinoma (OC) BRCA-like genomic copy number aberration profile classifier ("BRCA-like classifier"), which identifies tumors with deleterious mutations and epigenetic alterations in the homologous recombination pathway (1). We explored whether the classifier may also be predictive for therapies targeting tumors with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) such as olaparib, a PARP inhibitor with synthetic lethal interaction with HRD, in combination with bevacizumab. MethodsAs part of the ENGOT (European Network of Gynaecological Oncological Trial groups) HRD initiative, the OC BRCA-like classifier was evaluated using tumor-derived DNA samples from 469 out of 806 patients enrolled in the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial. PAOLA-1 is a randomized, double-blind, international phase 3 trial (NCT02477644) including advanced high grade OC patients. Prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was observed for patients treated with maintenance olaparib and bevacizumab versus placebo and bevacizumab, and particularly for those patients tested HRD positive according to Myriad MyChoice(R) CDx HRD test. ResultsResults were obtained for 442 patients (failure rate of 6%, 27 of 469 samples). A survival benefit from adding maintenance olaparib was observed in the 298 (67%) patients with a BRCA-like tumor (hazard ratio (HR) for PFS: 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-0.65, p = 0.01; OS: 0.64, 95% CI 0.45-0.90, p < 0.01). No benefit was detected in patients with a non-BRCA-like tumor when treated with olaparib (HR for PFS: 1.02, 95% CI 0.68-1.51, p = 0.93; OS 1.48, 95% CI 0.94-2.33, p = 0.09). P values for interaction between BRCA-like status and olaparib for PFS and OS were both 0.004. Multivariate analysis revealed comparable results. The concordance rate with the Myriad test was 77% in samples that were successfully analysed with both assays. In the survival analyses, the CIs of the BRCA-like classifier and the Myriad test overlap. ConclusionThe BRCA-like classifier is a high-sensitive predictive biomarker for survival benefit of olaparib/bevacizumab as maintenance therapy in advanced ovarian carcinoma with a low drop-out rate.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.0%
2
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.4%
3
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
4
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
6
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
8
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
15
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
16
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
18
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
20
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
21
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
22
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
23
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.5%
24
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%