Back

Identification of post-transcriptional modifications in nucleic acid sequences using propose-designed molecular beacons

Sahu, P.; Pereira, G.; Wang, J.; Dokholyan, N.; Szeliski, K.; tran, V.; Korneck, M.; Tigges, J.; Jones, J.; Ghiran, I.

2023-05-25 molecular biology
10.1101/2023.05.25.542360 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Post-transcriptional RNA modifications (PTxMs) present in small RNA species, specifically circulating extracellular RNAs, were recently identified as clinically relevant readouts, often more indicative of disease severity than the classical "up and down" changes in their copy number alone. While identification of PTxMs requires multiple and complex sample preparation steps, microgram-range amounts of RNA, followed by expensive and protracted bioinformatics analyses, the clinically relevant information is usually a yes/no for a particular genetic variant(s), and an up/down answer for relevant biomarkers. We have previously shown that molecular beacons (MBs) can identify specific nucleic acid sequences with picomolar sensitivity and single nucleotide specificity by exploiting the target-dependent change in their electrophoretic mobility profile. We now present a method for direct identification of miRNAs and isomiRs in cells and extracellular vesicles using gel electrophoresis, without the need for RNA isolation and purification. The detection is based on discreet changes in the hydrodynamic surface profile, the overall size, charge and charge distribution of the MB-target hybrid. Furthermore, using an RNA tertiary structure prediction algorithm (iFoldRNA) and a custom molecular dynamics simulation (DMD), we designed modified MBs specific for m6A-modified nucleotides in target RNA sequences. The sample preparation method coupled to the software package affords the design of specific MBs and sensitive, multiplex-type detection of targets in a wide variety of biofluids and cells, in a simple mix and read approach.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.