Back

Evaluation of the implementation and effects of management through care and services pathways: A protocol study

Maillet, L.; Thiebaut, G.-C.; Goudet, A.; Isabelle, G.; Touati, N.; Smits, P.; Duhoux, A.; Breton, M.; Abou-Malham, S.; Couturier, Y.; Gilbert, F.; Jean-Sebastien, M.; Denis, J.-L.

2023-05-26 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2023.05.25.23290549 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn 2015, the Government of Quebec undertook a vast reorganization of its health and social services network. This reform mainly aimed to promote and simplify access to services for the population, contributing to the improvement of the quality and safety of care, and increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of the network. Since 2016, several health care organizations (HCOs) have pushed reform even further by developing management through care and service pathways (MCSP). This study aims to identify, in a processual manner, the different factors involved in implementing MCSP in different HCOs, in the turbulent context of the COVID-19 pandemic. MethodThe methodology of this research project is based on developmental evaluation. The objective of developmental evaluation is to guide organizations and actors in the adaptation and development of innovations in complex and turbulent environments. Data will be collected over a three-year period using five strategies: i) organizational questionnaires; ii) analysis of clinical-administrative databases; iii) documentary analysis (grey and scientific literatures); iv) participant observations and v) semi-structured interviews with key actors involved in the implementation of MCSP. DiscussionIn addition to the operationalization of pathways, the implementation of MCSP i) involves transforming the governance of the health care organization both at the strategic and operational levels and ii) is a demanding process that requires changes in practices, modifications in the allocation and configuration of resources and the development of new collaborations between the different actors in the organization, the partners and the users involved in this transformation. Several studies claim that governance innovations can create conditions that are favourable to the emergence of innovations in terms of available services and responding to the needs of populations. This research will develop knowledge of the factors involved in implementing MCSP in complex and turbulent contexts and propose scale-up across the province.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.2%
50% of probability mass above
3
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.0%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.3%
5
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
7
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
8
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
9
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
10
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
11
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
12
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
13
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
14
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
15
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
16
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
17
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
18
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
20
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
21
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%