Back

Continuous positive airway pressure but not Liraglutide-mediated weight loss improves early cardiovascular disease in obstructive sleep apnea: Data from a randomized proof-of-concept study.

O'Donnell, C.; Crilly, S.; O'Mahony, A.; O'Riordan, B.; Traynor, M.; Gitau, R.; McDonald, K.; Ledwidge, M. T.; O'Shea, D.; Murphy, D. J.; Dodd, J. D.; Ryan, S.

2023-05-28 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.05.23.23290424
Show abstract

BackgroundObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality, but the benefit of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is uncertain. However, most randomized-controlled trials have focused on the role of CPAP in secondary prevention although there is growing evidence of a potential benefit on early CV disease. Weight loss in combination with CPAP may be superior but is difficult to achieve and maintain with conventional measures alone. The aim of this study was to gain insights into the effect of CPAP on early atherosclerotic processes and to compare it to a glucagon-like-peptide (GLP)-1-mediated weight loss regimen in OSA. MethodsWe performed a randomized proof-of-concept study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04186494) comparing CPAP, a liraglutide-based weight loss regimen (Lir) alone or both in combination for 24 weeks in 30 non-diabetic patients with moderate to severe OSA (50{+/-}7 years, 80% males, apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] 50{+/-}19/hr, body mass index [BMI] 35.0 {+/-}3 kg/m2). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Beside extensive evaluation for CV risk factors and endothelial function at baseline and end of study, subjects underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET-CT for measurement of aortic wall inflammation (target-to-background ratio [TBR]) and coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for semi- automated coronary plaque analysis. ResultsCPAP alone and combination resulted in greater reduction in AHI than Lir alone at 24 weeks (mean difference -45/hr and -43/hr, respectively, vs -12/hr, p<0.05). Both Lir and combination led to significant weight loss of 6{+/-}3% and 4{+/-}4%, respectively. Despite CPAP resulting in small weight gain, only the CPAP alone group demonstrated a significant decrease in vascular inflammation (aortic wall TBR from 2.03{+/-}0.34 to 1.84{+/-}0.43, p 0.010) associated with improvement in endothelial function and decrease in C-reactive protein. Low-attenuation coronary artery plaque volume as marker of unstable plaque also decreased with CPAP (from 571{+/-}490 to 334{+/-}185mm3) and with combination therapy (from 401{+/-}145 to 278{+/-}126mm3) but not with Lir. ConclusionThese data suggest that CPAP therapy, but not GLP-1 mediated weight loss, improves vascular inflammation and reduces low-attenuation coronary artery plaque volume in OSA patients. These novel findings support the benefit of CPAP therapy in modifying early CV disease. Clinical PerspectiveO_ST_ABSWhat is new?C_ST_ABSThis is the first study comparing standard CPAP therapy to a GLP-1 mediated weight loss regimen in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The study utilized 18F-FDG PET CT and artificial intelligence-enabled coronary CT quantification of coronary artery plaque subtypes to determine treatment effects on early atherosclerotic disease processes. What are the clinical implications?CPAP in contrast to GLP-1-mediated weight loss may improve early atherosclerotic and potentially modifiable disease processes in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). These data support the benefit of CPAP in the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in OSA.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 3%
10.2%
2
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
based on 33 papers
Top 2%
6.4%
3
Hypertension
based on 20 papers
Top 0.5%
6.4%
4
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Atherosclerosis
based on 16 papers
Top 0.8%
4.5%
6
European Heart Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
4.5%
7
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 52%
2.9%
8
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 5%
2.8%
9
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
based on 15 papers
Top 0.9%
2.8%
10
Circulation
based on 37 papers
Top 3%
2.8%
11
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
12
The American Journal of Cardiology
based on 15 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
based on 18 papers
Top 0.8%
2.4%
14
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 25%
2.4%
15
Heart Rhythm
based on 16 papers
Top 2%
2.3%
16
International Journal of Obesity
based on 17 papers
Top 1%
2.3%
17
Open Heart
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
1.8%
18
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
19
EBioMedicine
based on 21 papers
Top 0.3%
1.6%
20
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
based on 30 papers
Top 3%
1.6%
21
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
22
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 41%
1.6%
23
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
24
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 12%
1.3%
25
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 92%
1.3%
26
Circulation: Heart Failure
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
27
Frontiers in Endocrinology
based on 20 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
28
Journal of Sleep Research
based on 14 papers
Top 0.9%
1.2%
29
International Journal of Cardiology
based on 13 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
30
SLEEP
based on 11 papers
Top 0.9%
0.8%