Socioeconomic status and healthcare resource disparities among children with epilepsy in the United States: Results from a nationally representative sample
Muthiah, N.; Rothenberger, S.; Abel, T.
Show abstract
RationaleEpilepsy affects 1% of the US population. Healthcare and socioeconomic disparities are relatively well-studied among adults with epilepsy, but substantially less so among children. This study examines whether children with epilepsy 1) have lower SES than or 2) utilize healthcare resources differently from their peers, and 3) if SES moderates healthcare resource utilization. MethodsData from the 2016-2019 National Survey of Childrens Heath (NSCH) were used to identify children with active "epilepsy or seizure disorder". Children with versus without epilepsy were compared. SES and healthcare utilization variables were modeled with logistic and Poisson regressions. Significance was assessed at the alpha=0.05 level. ResultsThis analysis included 131,326 children; 835 were diagnosed with active epilepsy. The estimated population prevalence of epilepsy was 0.6%. A higher proportion of those with epilepsy were Black, non-Hispanic. Children with epilepsy were more likely to visit an ED (aOR=5.4), have seen a healthcare professional for medical care (aOR: 2.7), have [≥]1 preventative checkup (aOR: 2.3), and receive medical care from a specialist (aOR: 10.3). Children from higher-income households were less likely to have epilepsy (aOR: 0.7). SES moderated the relationship between epilepsy status and ED visits. Still, 7.7% of children with epilepsy needed healthcare but did not receive it, the most common barriers being: ineligibility for services (aOR: 3.2), problems getting an appointment (aOR: 3.9), and transportation issues (aOR: 4.7). ConclusionsChildren with epilepsy were more likely than their peers to live in lower income households, visit EDs, and see healthcare professionals. Despite increased needs, children with epilepsy had 2.6 times the odds of not receiving needed healthcare. SES moderated the relationship between epilepsy status and healthcare resource utilization. Most common barriers to healthcare were: service eligibility, appointment scheduling, and transport. Barrier-specific policy interventions may improve medical care access for children with epilepsy.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Global Epilepsy Needs Study (GENS): A mixed-methods, multi-country exploration of the unmet psychosocial and everyday needs of people with epilepsy 94%
- Frequency of and factors associated with antiseizure medication discontinuation discussions and decisions in patients with epilepsy: a multicenter retrospective chart review 93%
- A disease concept model for STXBP1 -related disorders 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Attributional bias in epilepsy: differences between genetic generalised epilepsy, temporal lobe epilepsy and healthy controls 91%
- Acute Seizures After Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage In Young Individuals: 11-Year Trends And Association With Mortality 91%
- Distinct psychopathology profiles in patients with epileptic seizures compared to non-epileptic psychogenic seizures 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effectiveness of Cenobamate in patients previously treated with Vagus Nerve Stimulation for drug resistant epilepsy 91%
- Real-world smartphone data can trace the behavioural impact of epilepsy: A Case study 88%
- Thalamohippocampal atrophy in focal epilepsy of unknown cause at the time of diagnosis 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early age at seizure onset is a risk factor for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children with epilepsy 94%
- Cognitive correlates of psychopathology in Functional/Dissociative Seizures and non-lesional epilepsy: an exploratory study 93%
- Social cognition after epilepsy surgery in temporal lobe epilepsy: A long-term follow-up 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.