Back

Defining the Subtypes of Long COVID and Risk Factors for Prolonged Disease

Resendez, S.; Brown, S. H.; Ruiz, S.; Rangan, P.; Nebeker, J. K.; Montella, D.; Elkin, P. L.

2023-05-21 health informatics
10.1101/2023.05.19.23290234 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceThere have been over 759 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 worldwide. A significant portion of these infections will lead to long COVID and its attendant morbidities and costs. ObjectiveTo empirically derive a long COVID case definition consisting of significantly increased signs, symptoms, and diagnoses to support clinical, public health, research, and policy initiatives related to the pandemic. DesignCase-Crossover Population-based study. SettingVeterans Affairs (VA) medical centers across the United States between January 1, 2020 and August 18, 2022. Participants367,148 individuals with positive COVID-19 tests and preexisting ICD-10-CM codes recorded in the VA electronic health record were enrolled. TriggerSARS-CoV-2 infection documented by positive laboratory test. Case WindowOne to seven months following positive COVID testing. Main Outcomes and MeasuresWe defined signs, symptoms, and diagnoses as being associated with long COVID if they had a novel case frequency of >= 1:1000 and they were significantly increased in our entire cohort after a positive COVID test when compared to case frequencies before COVID testing. We present odds ratios with confidence intervals for long COVID signs, symptoms, and diagnoses, organized by ICD-10-CM functional groups and medical specialty. We used our definition to assess long COVID risk based upon a patients demographics, Elixhauser score, vaccination status, and COVID disease severity. ResultsWe developed a long COVID definition consisting of 323 ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes grouped into 143 ICD-10-CM functional groups that were significantly increased in our 367,148 patient post-COVID population. We define seventeen medical-specialty long COVID subtypes such as cardiology long COVID. COVID-19 positive patients developed signs, symptoms, or diagnoses included in our long COVID definition at a proportion of at least 59.7% (based on all COVID positive patients). Patients with more severe cases of COVID-19 and multiple comorbidities were more likely to develop long COVID. Conclusions and RelevanceAn actionable, empirical definition for long COVID can help clinicians screen for and diagnose long COVID, allowing identified patients to be admitted into appropriate monitoring and treatment programs. An actionable long COVID definition can also support public health, research and policy initiatives. COVID patients with low oxygen saturation levels or multiple co-morbidities should be preferentially watched for the development of long COVID.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.3%
2
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
50% of probability mass above
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.2%
4
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
5
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
6
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
7
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
9
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
10
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
11
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
16
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
17
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
18
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
19
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
21
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%