Defining the Subtypes of Long COVID and Risk Factors for Prolonged Disease
Resendez, S.; Brown, S. H.; Ruiz, S.; Rangan, P.; Nebeker, J. K.; Montella, D.; Elkin, P. L.
Show abstract
ImportanceThere have been over 759 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 worldwide. A significant portion of these infections will lead to long COVID and its attendant morbidities and costs. ObjectiveTo empirically derive a long COVID case definition consisting of significantly increased signs, symptoms, and diagnoses to support clinical, public health, research, and policy initiatives related to the pandemic. DesignCase-Crossover Population-based study. SettingVeterans Affairs (VA) medical centers across the United States between January 1, 2020 and August 18, 2022. Participants367,148 individuals with positive COVID-19 tests and preexisting ICD-10-CM codes recorded in the VA electronic health record were enrolled. TriggerSARS-CoV-2 infection documented by positive laboratory test. Case WindowOne to seven months following positive COVID testing. Main Outcomes and MeasuresWe defined signs, symptoms, and diagnoses as being associated with long COVID if they had a novel case frequency of >= 1:1000 and they were significantly increased in our entire cohort after a positive COVID test when compared to case frequencies before COVID testing. We present odds ratios with confidence intervals for long COVID signs, symptoms, and diagnoses, organized by ICD-10-CM functional groups and medical specialty. We used our definition to assess long COVID risk based upon a patients demographics, Elixhauser score, vaccination status, and COVID disease severity. ResultsWe developed a long COVID definition consisting of 323 ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes grouped into 143 ICD-10-CM functional groups that were significantly increased in our 367,148 patient post-COVID population. We define seventeen medical-specialty long COVID subtypes such as cardiology long COVID. COVID-19 positive patients developed signs, symptoms, or diagnoses included in our long COVID definition at a proportion of at least 59.7% (based on all COVID positive patients). Patients with more severe cases of COVID-19 and multiple comorbidities were more likely to develop long COVID. Conclusions and RelevanceAn actionable, empirical definition for long COVID can help clinicians screen for and diagnose long COVID, allowing identified patients to be admitted into appropriate monitoring and treatment programs. An actionable long COVID definition can also support public health, research and policy initiatives. COVID patients with low oxygen saturation levels or multiple co-morbidities should be preferentially watched for the development of long COVID.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Early initiation of prophylactic anticoagulation for prevention of COVID-19 mortality: a nationwide cohort study of hospitalized patients in the United States 94%
- Characterizing the incidence of adverse events of special interest for COVID-19 vaccines across eight countries: a multinational network cohort study 93%
- Factors associated with hospitalization and critical illness among 4,103 patients with COVID-19 disease in New York City 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a clinical risk score to predict SARS-CoV-2 infection in emergency department patients: The CCEDRRN COVID-19 Infection Score (CCIS) 95%
- Viral And Antibody Testing For Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19): Factors Associated With Positivity In Electronic Health Records From The United States 94%
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Multicenter Evaluation of Blood Purification with Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Preliminary Report 92%
- Cardiovascular disease and severe hypoxemia associated with higher rates of non-invasive respiratory support failure in COVID-19 92%
- In-silico modeling of COVID-19 ARDS: pathophysiological insights and potential management implications 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Score for Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP): An Interpretable Machine Learning AutoScore–Derived Triage Tool for Predicting Mortality after Emergency Admissions 93%
- Children with SARS-CoV-2 in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) 93%
- COVID-19 outcomes, risk factors and associations by race: a comprehensive analysis using electronic health records data in Michigan Medicine 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.