Systematic Review of Monogenic Diabetes Prognostics
Naylor, R. N.; Amouyal, C.; Philipson, L. H.; Vatier, C.; Dickens, L. T.; American Diabetes Association/European Association for the Study of Diabetes Precision Medicine Init, ; Greeley, S. A. W.
Show abstract
BackgroundIndividuals with monogenic diabetes are at risk for diabetes-related complications; however, overall prognosis and whether prognosis is similar to other diabetes forms is poorly understood. AimTo assess diabetes-related microvascular and macrovascular complications in the common forms of monogenic diabetes. MethodsSystematic review with data sources from Pubmed, Medline and Embase was performed to assess diabetes-related complications in KCNJ11-neonatal diabetes, ABBC8-neontal diabetes, HNF1A-diabetes, HNF4-diabetes and GCK-related hyperglycemia. ResultsData was extracted from 67 studies. Most studies had moderate to high risk of bias. In neonatal diabetes, 16 of 20 studies reported at least one microvascular complication, with complications occurring as early as the second decade of life. Macrovascular complications were reported in only 1 individual who was 40 years old at the time of study. Diabetes complications were frequent in HNF1A-diabetes and HNF4A-diabetes, but did show a temporal trend of improved prognosis (e.g., 47% versus 13.6% retinopathy) and better prognosis compared to type 1 diabetes. Death due to cardiovascular disease was higher in HNF1A-diabetes compared to unaffected relatives (66% versus 43%). GCK-related hyperglycemia showed overall low rates of complications. ConclusionWhile KCNJ11-neonatal diabetes, ABBC8-neontal diabetes, HNF1A-diabetes and HNF4-diabetes are clearly at risk for diabetes-related complications, microvascular complications were infrequently reported before the third decade of life. GCK-related hyperglycemia showed a low prevalence of complications with rates not significantly different from control groups except for mild retinopathy. Future prospective studies to determine age at onset of complications and the impact of precision therapy are warranted to best guide surveillance practices for each subtype.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnic differences in the manifestation of early-onset type 2 diabetes 95%
- Comprehensive validation of fasting- and oral glucose tolerance test-based indices of insulin secretion against gold-standard measures 92%
- Severe COVID-19 and Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study from Three London Teaching Hospitals 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accounting for age-related increases in HbA1c more accurately quantifies risk of Type 1 Diabetes progression in islet autoantibody-positive adults 93%
- Relation of incident Type 1 diabetes to recent COVID-19 infection: cohort study using e-health record linkage in Scotland 93%
- The impact of ancestry on performance of type 1 diabetes genetic risk scores: high discrimination performance is maintained in African ancestry populations, but population specific thresholds may improve risk prediction 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Treatment outcomes with oral anti-hyperglycaemic therapies in people with diabetes secondary to a pancreatic condition (type 3c diabetes): A population-based cohort study 94%
- Covid-19 fatality prediction in people with diabetes and prediabetes using a simple score at hospital admission 93%
- Use of semaglutide and risk of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy: A Danish-Norwegian cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence trends of diabetes subgroups in US: A data-driven analysis spanning three decades from NHANES (1988-2018) 94%
- Prediabetes as a risk factor for all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a prospective analysis of 115,919 adults without diabetes in Mexico City 92%
- Incretin hypersecretion in gestational diabetes mellitus 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.