Trends in occupational respiratory conditions with short latency from 1999 to 2019 in the UK - evidence from the Surveillance of Work-related and Occupational Respiratory Disease (SWORD) reporting scheme
Barradas, A.; Iskandar, I.; Carder, M.; Gittins, M.; Byrne, L.; Taylor, S.; Daniels, S.; Wiggans, R. E.; Fishwick, D.; Seed, M.; van Tongeren, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundOccupational short-latency respiratory disease (SLRD; predominantly asthma, rhinitis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and occupational infections) prevalence is difficult to determine but certain occupations may be associated with increased susceptibility. AimsThis study aimed to examine which occupations and industries are currently at high risk for SLRD and determine their respective suspected causal agents based on cases reported by physicians to the Surveillance of Work-related and Occupational Respiratory Disease (SWORD) scheme in the UK. MethodsSLRD cases reported to the SWORD scheme between 1999 and 2019 were analysed to determine directly standardised rate ratios (SRR) by occupation against the average rate for all other occupations combined. ResultsBakers and flour confectioners showed significantly raised SRR for occupational rhinitis (234.4 [95% CI, 200.5 - 274.0]) and asthma (59.9 [95% CI, 51.6 - 69.5]). Chemical and related process operatives also presented raised SRR values for these two conditions, with SRR of 29.5 [95% CI, 24.3 - 35.7] and 21.0 [95% CI, 16.9 - 26.1] for rhinitis and asthma, respectively. SRR were also significantly raised for vehicle spray painters when considering occupational asthma (63.5 [95% CI, 51.5 - 78.3]) alone, and laboratory technicians were also amongst the top three increased SRR for rhinitis (18.7 [95% CI, 15.1 - 23.1]). The suspected agents most frequently associated with these occupations and conditions were flour, isocyanates, and laboratory animals and insects. Metal machining setters and setter-operators showed increased SRR for occupational hypersensitivity pneumonitis (42.0 [95% CI, 29.3 - 60.3]), largely due to cutting/soluble oils. The occupation mostly affected by infectious disease was welding trades (12.9 [95% CI, 5.7 - 29.3]) and the suspected causal agent predominantly reported for this condition was pathogens and microorganisms, with a predominance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. ConclusionsThis study identified the occupational groups at increased risk of developing a SLRD based on data recorded over a recent two-decade period in the UK. Asthma and rhinitis were identified as the prevailing conditions and hypersensitivity pneumonitis as a potentially rising respiratory problem in the metalworking industry.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Atopy, asthma symptoms, and eosinophilic airway inflammation in British woodworkers 95%
- Occupation, Work-Related Contact, and SARS-CoV-2 Anti-Nucleocapsid Serological Status: Findings from the Virus Watch prospective cohort study 94%
- Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among workers of the public higher education institutions of Porto, Portugal 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Professional practice for COVID-19 risk reduction among health care workers: a Cross-Sectional Study with Matched Case-Control Comparison 92%
- Exposure to Traffic-Related Air Pollution is Associated with Greater Bacterial Diversity in the Lower Respiratory Tract of Children 92%
- Disparities in COVID-19 Fatalities among Working Californians 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in adults exposed to fine particles from a coal mine fire 93%
- Long-term exposure to air pollution and risk of adult-onset asthma and COPD: Danish nationwide cohort study 90%
- Clinical utility of home versus hospital spirometry in fibrotic ILD: evaluation following INJUSTIS interim analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of respirator vs. surgical masks in healthcare personnel and its impact on SARS-CoV-2 acquisition – a prospective multicentre cohort study 92%
- Occupational versus community risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among employees of a long-term care facility: an observational study 91%
- Low frequency of community-acquired bacterial co-infection in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 based on clinical, radiological and microbiological criteria; a retrospective cohort study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of Environmental and Occupational Risk Factors for the Mitigation and Containment of a COVID-19 Outbreak in a Meat Processing Plant 94%
- Long term impact on lung function of patients with moderate and severe COVID-19. A prospective cohort study 89%
- Aerosol Formation During Processing of Potentially Infectious Samples on Roche Immunochemistry Analyzers (cobas e analyzers) and in an End-to-End Laboratory Workflow to Model SARS-CoV-2 Infection Risk for Laboratory Operators 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.