Back

Trends in occupational respiratory conditions with short latency from 1999 to 2019 in the UK - evidence from the Surveillance of Work-related and Occupational Respiratory Disease (SWORD) reporting scheme

Barradas, A.; Iskandar, I.; Carder, M.; Gittins, M.; Byrne, L.; Taylor, S.; Daniels, S.; Wiggans, R. E.; Fishwick, D.; Seed, M.; van Tongeren, M.

2023-05-21 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2023.05.19.23290195 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOccupational short-latency respiratory disease (SLRD; predominantly asthma, rhinitis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and occupational infections) prevalence is difficult to determine but certain occupations may be associated with increased susceptibility. AimsThis study aimed to examine which occupations and industries are currently at high risk for SLRD and determine their respective suspected causal agents based on cases reported by physicians to the Surveillance of Work-related and Occupational Respiratory Disease (SWORD) scheme in the UK. MethodsSLRD cases reported to the SWORD scheme between 1999 and 2019 were analysed to determine directly standardised rate ratios (SRR) by occupation against the average rate for all other occupations combined. ResultsBakers and flour confectioners showed significantly raised SRR for occupational rhinitis (234.4 [95% CI, 200.5 - 274.0]) and asthma (59.9 [95% CI, 51.6 - 69.5]). Chemical and related process operatives also presented raised SRR values for these two conditions, with SRR of 29.5 [95% CI, 24.3 - 35.7] and 21.0 [95% CI, 16.9 - 26.1] for rhinitis and asthma, respectively. SRR were also significantly raised for vehicle spray painters when considering occupational asthma (63.5 [95% CI, 51.5 - 78.3]) alone, and laboratory technicians were also amongst the top three increased SRR for rhinitis (18.7 [95% CI, 15.1 - 23.1]). The suspected agents most frequently associated with these occupations and conditions were flour, isocyanates, and laboratory animals and insects. Metal machining setters and setter-operators showed increased SRR for occupational hypersensitivity pneumonitis (42.0 [95% CI, 29.3 - 60.3]), largely due to cutting/soluble oils. The occupation mostly affected by infectious disease was welding trades (12.9 [95% CI, 5.7 - 29.3]) and the suspected causal agent predominantly reported for this condition was pathogens and microorganisms, with a predominance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. ConclusionsThis study identified the occupational groups at increased risk of developing a SLRD based on data recorded over a recent two-decade period in the UK. Asthma and rhinitis were identified as the prevailing conditions and hypersensitivity pneumonitis as a potentially rising respiratory problem in the metalworking industry.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
5
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
8
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
9
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
11
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
16
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
17
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
18
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
19
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.6%
20
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
21
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
23
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Journal of Occupational Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%