Back

Routine respiratory metagenomics service for intensive care unit patients

CHARALAMPOUS, T.; Alcolea-Medina, A.; Snell, L. B.; Alder, C.; Tan, M.; Williams, T. G. S.; Al-Yaakoubi, N.; Humayun, G.; Meadows, C. I. S.; Wyncoll, D. L. A.; Richard, P.; Hemsley, C. J.; Jeyaratnam, D.; Newsholme, W.; Goldenberg, S.; Patel, A.; Tucker, F.; Nebbia, G.; Wilks, M.; Chand, M.; Cliff, P. R.; Batra, R.; O"Grady, J.; Barrett, N. A.; Edgeworth, J. D.

2023-05-16 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2023.05.15.23289731 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRespiratory metagenomics (RMg) needs evaluation in a pilot service setting to determine utility and inform implementation into clinical practice. MethodsFeasibility, performance and clinical impacts on antimicrobial prescribing and infection control were recorded during a pilot RMg service for patients with suspected lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) on two general and one specialist respiratory intensive care units (ICU) at Guys & St Thomas NHS foundation Trust, London. ResultsRMg was performed on 128 samples from 87 patients during the first 15-weeks providing same-day results for 110 samples (86%) with median turnaround time of 6.7hrs (IQR 6.1-7.5 hrs). RMg was 92% sensitive and 82% specific for clinically-relevant pathogens compared with routine testing. 48% of RMg results informed antimicrobial prescribing changes (22% escalation; 26% de-escalation) with escalation based on speciation in 20/24 cases and detection of acquired-resistance genes in 4/24 cases. Fastidious or unexpected organisms were reported in 21 samples including anaerobes (n=12), Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Tropheryma whipplei, cytomegalovirus and Legionella pneumophila ST1326, which was subsequently isolated from the bed-side water outlet. Application to consecutive severe community-acquired LRTI cases identified Staphylococcus aureus (two with SCCmec and three with luk F/S virulence determinants), Streptococcus pyogenes (emm1-M1uk clone), S. dysgalactiae subspecies equisimilis (STG62647A) and Aspergillus fumigatus with multiple treatments and public-health impacts. ConclusionsRMg provides frequent diverse benefits for treatment, infection control and public health. The combination of rapid comprehensive results, alongside revealing and characterising a hidden burden of infections makes the case for expediting routine service implementation.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
44.2%
2
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.6%
50% of probability mass above
3
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.6%
4
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
5
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
7
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
8
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
9
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.8%
11
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
12
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
13
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
17
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
20
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%