Back

A Robust Deep Learning Approach for Joint Nuclei Detection and Cell Classification in Pan-Cancer Histology Images

Walia, V.; Kotte, S.; Sivadasan, N.; Sharma, H.; Joseph, T.; Varma, B.; Mukherjee, G.; V.G, S.

2023-05-12 pathology
10.1101/2023.05.10.540156 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Advanced image processing methods have shown promise in computational pathology, including the extraction of crucial microscopic features from histology images. Accurate detection and classification of cell nuclei from whole-slide images (WSI) play a crucial role in capturing the molecular and morphological landscape of the tissue sample. They enable widespread downstream applications, including cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and discovery of novel markers. Robust nuclei detection and classification are challenging due to the high intra-class variability and inter-class similarity of the microscopic morphological features. This is further compounded by the domain shift arising due to the variability in tissue types, staining protocols, and image acquisition. Motivated by the ability of the recent deep learning techniques to learn complex patterns in a biasfree manner, we develop a novel and robust deep learning model TransNuc, based on vision transformers, for simultaneous detection and classification of cell nuclei from H&E stained WSI. We benchmarked TransNuc on the comprehensive Open Pan-cancer Histology Dataset (PanNuke), sampled from over 20,000 WSI, comprising 19 different tissue types and five clinically important cell classes, namely, Neoplastic, Epithelial, Inflammatory, Connective, and Dead cells. TransNuc exhibited superior performance compared to the state-of-theart, including Hover-Net and Micro-Net. TransNuc was able to learn robust feature representations and thereby perform consistently better for the abundant classes such as neoplastic, and the under-represented classes such as dead cells. Similar performance gains were also obtained for epithelial and connective classes that have a significant inter-class morphological similarity.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Pathology Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.4%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.8%
3
Modern Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Advanced Intelligent Systems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.0%
10
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
12
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.4%
16
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.4%
17
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
18
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
21
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Optics Express
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.6%
27
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%