Back

A High-Throughput Sampling Method for Detection of Meloidogyne enterolobii and Other Root-Knot Nematodes in Sweetpotato Storage Roots

Culbreath, J.; Wram, C.; Khanal, C.; Bechtel, T.; Wadl, P. A.; Mueller, J.; Rutter, W. B.

2023-05-10 molecular biology
10.1101/2023.05.10.540019 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Meloidogyne enterolobii is an aggressive root-knot nematode (RKN) species that has emerged as a significant pathogen of sweetpotato in the Southeastern United States. M. enterolobii is spread primarily through the movement of infected seed sweetpotatoes used for propagation. The RKN resistance in commercially grown sweetpotato cultivars has proven ineffective against this nematode. Detecting RKN in sweetpotato by eye is unreliable, and further distinguishing M. enterolobii from other RKN species that infect sweetpotato is labor intensive; relying on molecular tests conducted on individual nematodes dissected out of host roots by trained technicians. Here, we have developed a high-throughput survey method to collect skin samples and extract total DNA from batches of sweetpotato storage roots. Combining this method with species-specific PCR assays allowed for quick and sensitive detection of M. enterolobii and other RKN species infecting sweetpotatoes. We tested this method using batches of infected storage roots at varying levels of M. enterolobii infection. We also inoculated skin samples with varying numbers of individual M. enterolobii eggs to determine the methods detection threshold and used this method to conduct surveys for RKN on fresh market sweetpotatoes. Our results show that this method can consistently and reliably detect M. enterolobii in sweetpotato batches at levels as low as 2 eggs per 10 mL skin sample. This method will be a useful tool to help screen for the presence of M. enterolobii in seed sweetpotatoes before they are replanted, thereby helping to slow the spread of this nematode to M. enterolobii-free sweetpotato growing operations.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.1%
2
Journal of Economic Entomology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.6%
4
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.0%
6
Parasites & Vectors
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
7
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
9
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
11
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
12
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
13
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
14
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
International Journal for Parasitology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
Medical and Veterinary Entomology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
22
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
26
Plant Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%