Equivalent physical dose (EPD) for improved precision in voxelized dosimetry
Abbott, E. M.
Show abstract
PurposeEquivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2), based on the original biological effective dose (BED) equation, is frequently used to guide treatment in the clinic. This work addresses the limitations of EQD2 in the context of voxelized dosimetry, clarifies potential sources of confusion, and provides an alternative formulation for improved precision. Methods and MaterialsThe EQD2 formula was evaluated by a simple insertion of the EQD2 dose into the BED equation. The mathematically exact form of EQD2, referred to here as equivalent physical dose (EPD), was provided by solving the linear-quadratic model BED equation for dose using the quadratic formula. The EPD derivation was compared in terms of absolute error to the EQD2 derivation, which separates the Relative Effect term from the BED equation. ResultsThe EQD2 expression implicitly assumed a homogenous dose, demonstrating that its use in voxelized dosimetry can mislead. As an alternative formulation, EPD was shown to adhere more closely to the first principles of radiobiological modeling. An error analysis identified absolute errors from EQD2 sometimes in excess of 10%. ConclusionsAssumptions in the standard EQD2 equation are inappropriate in the context of voxelized dosimetry, where voxels within a structure, such as a target volume, may receive a dose that differs from the prescribed dose. Using EPD (or BED) instead of EQD2 would address these areas of confusion. Optimizing therapy according to biological properties in this way could provide enhanced and more reliable radiobiological input to radiotherapy treatment planning.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cluster-Based Toxicity Estimation of Osteoradionecrosis via Unsupervised Machine Learning: Moving Beyond Single Dose-Parameter Normal Tissue Complication Probability by Using Whole Dose-Volume Histograms for Cohort Risk Stratification 97%
- Clinical Impact of Contouring Variability for Prostate Cancer Tumor Boost 95%
- Comprehensive Quantitative Evaluation of Inter-observer Delineation Performance of MR-guided Delineation of Oropharyngeal Gross Tumor Volumes and High-risk Clinical Target Therapy: An R-IDEAL Stage 0 Prospective Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of indirect damage and damage saturation effects in dose-response curves of hypofractionated radiotherapy of early-stage NSCLC and brain metastases 95%
- Dosimetric and biologic intercomparison between electron and proton FLASH beams 94%
- Artificial Intelligence Uncertainty Quantification in Radiotherapy Applications - A Scoping Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Morphological changes after cranial fractionated photon radiotherapy: localized loss of white matter and grey matter volume with increasing dose 94%
- Detection of Alteration in Carotid Artery Volumetry Using Standard-of-care Computed Tomography Surveillance Scans Following Unilateral Radiation Therapy for Early-stage Tonsillar Squamous Cell Carcinoma Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Internally-Matched Carotid Isodose Analysis 93%
- Trial protocol: RadTARGET, a multicenter phase II randomized controlled trial evaluating focal radiotherapy boost with de-intensification of dose to non-suspicious prostate in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cell lines of the same anatomic site and histologic type show large variability in intrinsic radiosensitivity and relative biological effectiveness to protons and carbon ions 95%
- Evaluation of inverse treatment planning for Gamma Knife radiosurgery using fMRI brain activation maps as organs at risk 93%
- Quality Assurance Assessment of Intra-Acquisition Diffusion-Weighted and T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Registration and Contour Propagation for Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.