Back

Dark nanodiscs as a model membrane for evaluating membrane protein thermostability by differential scanning fluorimetry

Selvasingh, J. A.; McDonald, E. F.; Mckinney, J. R.; Ledwitch, K. V.; Meiler, J.

2023-05-09 biophysics
10.1101/2023.05.08.539917 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Measuring protein thermostability provides valuable information on the biophysical rules that govern structure-energy relationships of proteins. However, such measurements remain a challenge for membrane proteins. Here, we introduce a new experimental system to evaluate membrane protein thermostability. This system leverages a recently-developed non-fluorescent membrane scaffold protein (MSP) to reconstitute proteins into nanodiscs and is coupled with a nano-format of differential scanning fluorimetry (nanoDSF). This approach offers a label-free and direct measurement of the intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence of the membrane protein as it unfolds in solution without signal interference from the "dark" nanodisc. In this work, we demonstrate the application of this method using the disulfide bond formation protein B (DsbB) as a test membrane protein. NanoDSF measurements of DsbB reconstituted in dark nanodiscs show a complex biphasic thermal unfolding pattern in the presence of lipids with a minor unfolding transition followed by a major transition. The inflection points of the thermal denaturation curve reveal two distinct unfolding midpoint melting temperatures (Tm) of 70.5 {degrees}C and 77.5 {degrees}C, consistent with a three-state unfolding model. Further, we show that the catalytically conserved disulfide bond between residues C41 and C130 drives the intermediate state of the unfolding pathway for DsbB in a nanodisc. We introduce this method as a new tool that can be used to understand how compositionally, and biophysically complex lipid environments drive membrane protein stability.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.