Back

Patterned Metal Grids for Flexible and Transparent Neural Microelectrode Arrays

Trepo, I.; Pinto, J. V.; Santa, A.; Pereira, M. E.; Calmeiro, T.; Coelho, B.; Henriques, C.; Martins, R.; Fortunato, E.; Carey, M. R.; Marques, H. G.; Barquinha, P.; Neto, J. P.

2023-05-08 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.05.08.539822 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Flexible and transparent microelectrodes can provide large-scale neural recordings with temporal and spatial resolution when used alongside functional calcium imaging. Patterned metal grids defined by direct laser writing (DWL) are a promising approach for these electrodes, as they resort to standard microfabrication processes and materials, allowing the possibility of mass production. For these reasons, a study exploring transparent grid-based electrodes using DWL for measuring electrocorticography signal was performed. Patterned metal grids with 1 m of linewidth and 22 m of spacing between lines showed a sheet resistance of 6 {Omega}/sq and a transmittance of 81% at 550 nm. The grids were transferred to a 5 m Parylene-C membrane using an optimized procedure that involves an oxygen plasma pre-treatment. This procedure ensures mechanical robustness and stability of the grids. Finally, a flexible and transparent prototype was fabricated with a microelectrode array composed by 16 electrodes with 500 m of diameter. These microelectrodes shown an impedance of 10 k{Omega} at 1 kHz in saline solution and they are highly conformal facilitating in vivo implantation and the recording of neural activity in the mouse cerebellum surface. To conclude, patterned metal grids based-electrodes exhibit a promising performance compared to transparent conductive oxides or graphene. Moreover, the introduction of DLW enables easy and fast manipulation of grid shape and dimensions without the need of physical masks, while keeping large scale compatibility, which is important for tools used in neuroscience community.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.