Back

COVID-19 in meat plants: activation of a Target Prevention Plan, in Italy

Di Leone, G.; Bertinato, L.; Brambilla, G.; Manno, V.; Napolano, F.; Savi, S.; Settimo, G.; Lagravinese, D.

2023-05-11 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2023.05.08.23289661 medRxiv
Show abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemics, several outbreaks have been recorded all other the world in industrial slaughterhouses and meat processing plants. Occupational preventive medicine in such non-healthcare frontline essential services accounts for combined different environmental, social, and economic factors, to reduce the burden of COVID-19 in the workplaces and in the connected residential settings. In Italy, during the first year of the pandemics, an advocacy action has been activated, targeted on meat plant managers and related food business operators. A risk-oriented control plan was agreed by competent Italian Health Authorities at Region/Province level. A questionnaire focused on the inventoried risk factors reported in the literature in such working places have been developped as supporting tool, and administered on voluntary basis to the interested stakeholders. In addition, an outbreak questionnaire was proposed to the Prevention Depts of the Local Health Units. In the 2021 - 2022 years timeframe, we collected 333 advocacy and 24 outbreak questionnaires, respectively, on 4,765 inventoried plants at national level. Responses came mainly from those districts that locally activated the risk-oriented control plan. The lack of awareness to update the Risk Assessment Document of the meat plant for COVID-19, non instrumental body Temperature checks of workers at the entrance, working force from different subcontractors, poor hygiene in the shared places and insufficient ventilation represented the main critical points recorded. The cross-checks between the results from the advocacy and from the outbreak questionnaires are feeding an after-action review for such food-chain related essential work settings within a One Health approach.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
44.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
5.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.9%
5
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
6
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
Journal of Occupational Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
8
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
9
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
10
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
11
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
12
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
13
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
14
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
15
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
16
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
18
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
21
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.5%
22
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.5%
24
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
25
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.5%