Predicting Parkinson's disease progression using MRI-based white matter radiomic biomarker and machine learning: a reproducibility and replicability study
Arafe, M.; Bhagwat, N. P.; Chatelain, Y.; Dugre, M.; Sokolowski, A.; Wang, M.; Xiao, Y.; Sharp, M.; Poline, J.-B.; Glatard, T.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe availability of reliable biomarkers of Parkinsons disease (PD) progression is critical to the understanding of the disease and development of treatment options. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) provides a promising source of PD biomarkers, however, neuroimaging results have been shown to be markedly sensitive to analytical conditions and population sampling, which motivates investigations of their robustness. This study is part of a project to investigate the replicability of 11 structural MRI measures of PD identified in a recent review. ObjectiveThis paper attempts to reproduce (similar data, similar analysis) and replicate (variations in data and analysis) the design of the machine learning (ML) model described in [1] to predict PD progression from T1-weighted MRIs. MethodsWe used the Parkinsons Progression Markers Initiative dataset (PPMI, ppmi-info.org) used in [1] and we followed as closely as possible the original methods. We also investigated slight methodological variations in cohort selection, feature extraction, ML model design, and evaluation techniques. ResultsThe Area under the ROC Curve (AUC) achieved by our model closely reproducing the original study remained lower than 0.5. Across all tested models, we obtained a peak AUC of 0.685, which is better than chance performance but remained lower than the AUC value of 0.795 reported in [1]. ConclusionWe managed to train a model that predicts disease progression with a performance better than chance on a cohort extracted from the PPMI dataset, using methods adapted from [1]. However, the performance of this model remains substantially lower than the one reported in [1]. Our difficulties to reproduce or replicate the original work are likely explained by the relatively low sample size in the original study. We provide recommendations on how to improve the reproducibility of MRI-based ML models of PD in the future.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- TractoInferno: A large-scale, open-source, multi-site database for machine learning dMRI tractography 95%
- Magnetic resonance imaging datasets with anatomical fiducials for quality control and registration 94%
- A large, curated, open-source stroke neuroimaging dataset to improve lesion segmentation algorithms 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- OpenMAP-T1: A Rapid Deep Learning Approach to Parcellate 280 Anatomical Regions to Cover the Whole Brain 96%
- Deep-learning based fully automatic segmentation of the globus pallidus interna and externa using ultra-high 7 Tesla MRI 96%
- Deep Bayesian networks for uncertainty estimation and adversarial resistance of white matter hyperintensity segmentation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Freewater EstimatoR using iNtErpolated iniTialization (FERNET): Toward Accurate Estimation of Free Water in Peritumoral Region Using Single-Shell Diffusion MRI Data 95%
- Differentiation of white matter histopathology using b-tensor encoding and machine learning 94%
- pyKNEEr: An image analysis workflow for open and reproducible research on femoral knee cartilage 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A preliminary attempt to harmonize using physics-constrained deep neural networks for multisite and multiscanner MRI datasets (PhyCHarm) 95%
- An automated pipeline for extracting quantitative histological metrics for voxelwise MRI-histology comparisons 94%
- Decoding the microstructural properties of white matter using realistic models 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.