Back

Discontinuation of Heart Failure Therapy in Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac surgery: Data from a Real-world Cohort

Elharram, M.; Wang, X.; Gouda, P.; Graham, M. M.

2023-05-08 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.05.05.23289601 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and AimsPatients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are at high risk for cardiovascular events following non-cardiac surgery. The perioperative period represents many challenges to maintain guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT). We examined GDMT use in HFrEF patients following non-cardiac surgery, and the association of medication changes with cardiovascular outcomes. MethodsUsing linked administrative databases, a retrospective cohort of HFrEF patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery between 2008 and 2020 was formed. Pre-operative use of GDMT was determined by outpatient prescriptions up to 90 days prior to surgery. Changes in GDMT was defined as discontinuation or a dose reduction ([≥]50%) of baseline therapies at 90 days after discharge. The primary composite outcome was HF hospitalization or all-cause mortality at one-year adjusted for age, sex, components of the Revised Cardiac Risk Index and the Charlson Comorbidity index. ResultsOf 397,829 index surgeries, there were 7667 (2%) patients with pre-existing HFrEF on at least one GDMT (50.6% female; mean age: 75 +/- 12 years). At 90 days post-operatively, 46% of patients had undergone major changes to GDMT. Compared to patients who continued GDMT, patients with any change to therapy had a higher incidence of the primary outcome (52% vs. 46%, aOR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.03-1.25) and all-cause mortality at one year (8.5% vs. 4.9%, aOR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.3-1.90). ConclusionAmong patients with HFrEF undergoing major non-cardiac surgery, few are on optimal GDMT, and perioperative changes to GDMT is associated with higher odds for HF hospitalization or death.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.