Molecule-Morphology Contrastive Pretraining for Transferable Molecular Representation
Nguyen, C. Q.; Pertusi, D.; Branson, K. M.
Show abstract
Image-based profiling techniques have become increasingly popular over the past decade for their applications in target identification, mechanism-of-action inference, and assay development. These techniques have generated large datasets of cellular morphologies, which are typically used to investigate the effects of small molecule perturbagens. In this work, we extend the impact of such dataset to improving quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models by introducing Molecule-Morphology Contrastive Pretraining (MoCoP), a framework for learning multi-modal representation of molecular graphs and cellular morphologies. We scale MoCoP to approximately 100K molecules and 600K morphological profiles using data from the JUMP-CP Consortium and show that MoCoP consistently improves performances of graph neural networks (GNNs) on molecular property prediction tasks in ChEMBL20 across all dataset sizes. The pretrained GNNs are also evaluated on internal GSK pharmacokinetic data and show an average improvement of 2.6% and 6.3% in AUPRC for full and low data regimes, respectively. Our findings suggest that integrating cellular morphologies with molecular graphs using MoCoP can significantly improve the performance of QSAR models, ultimately expanding the deep learning toolbox available for QSAR applications.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- DrugDiff - small molecule diffusion model with flexible guidance towards molecular properties 95%
- DeepGraphMol, a multi-objective, computational strategy for generating molecules with desirable properties: a graph convolution and reinforcement learning approach 94%
- Chemical Genomics Language Model toward Reliable and Explainable Compound-Protein Interaction Exploration 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.