COVID AMP: An Open Access Database of COVID-19 Response Policies
Katz, R.; Toole, K.; Robertson, H.; Case, A.; Kerr, J.; Robinson-Marshall, S.; Schermerhorn, J.; Orsborn, S.; Van Maele, M.; Zimmerman, R.; Stevens, T.; COVID AMP Coding Team, ; Phelan, A.; Carlson, C. J.; Graeden, E.
Show abstract
As the COVID-19 pandemic unfolded in the spring of 2020, governments around the world began to implement policies to mitigate and manage the outbreak. Significant research efforts were deployed to track and analyse these policies in real-time to better inform the response. While much of the policy analysis focused narrowly on social distancing measures designed to slow the spread of disease, here, we present a dataset focused on capturing the breadth of policy types implemented by jurisdictions globally across the whole-of-government. COVID Analysis and Mapping of Policies (COVID AMP) includes nearly 50,000 policy measures from 150 countries, 124 intermediate areas, and 235 local areas between January 2020 and June 2022. With up to 40 structured and unstructured characteristics encoded per policy, as well as the original source and policy text, this dataset provides a uniquely broad capture of the governance strategies for pandemic response, serving as a critical data source for future work in legal epidemiology and political science.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Pandemic Journaling Project: A new dataset of first-person accounts of the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Which COVID policies are most effective? A Bayesian analysis of COVID-19 by jurisdiction 93%
- Demographic and socioeconomic determinants of access to care: A subgroup disparity analysis using new equity-focused measurements 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Urban pandemic response: survey results describing the experiences from twenty-five cities during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- How do local-level authorities engage in epidemic and pandemic preparedness activities and coordinate with higher levels of government? Survey results from 33 cities 93%
- Architecture of systems affecting disease trajectories in a conflict zone: A community-centered systems inquiry in North Gaza 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Deep Recurrent Reinforced Learning model to compare the efficacy of targeted local vs. national measures on the spread of COVID-19 in the UK 92%
- Public acceptability of non-pharmaceutical interventions to control a pandemic in the United Kingdom: a discrete choice experiment 90%
- Cohort Study Protocol of the Brazilian Collaborative Research Network on COVID-19: strengthening WHO global data 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.