Back

Needlestick Injuries in Healthcare, Research and Veterinary Environments in a Sample Population in British Columbia and their Economic, Psychological and Workplace Impacts

Magrill, J.; Low, S. Y. S.; Na, I.

2023-04-28 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2023.04.27.23288880 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionNeedle-stick injuries (NSIs) are defined as the sharp point of a needle puncturing human skin. This article examines the risk and illustrates the burden of NSIs for workers in the healthcare, veterinary and research industries, and includes a sample survey population of workers in workplaces using needles. MethodsFor the review component of this article, PubMed and Google Scholar were queried within the date range of 1998-2022, retrieving 1,437 results. A publicly available sample population dataset was and analyzed from British Columbia (n=30) on workplace needlestick injuries. The OSHA, WHO, and NIEHS guidelines were reviewed, and the WorkSafe BC injury database was searched using FIPPA requests. DiscussionRecapping remains a common practice despite decades of guidelines recommending against recapping. NSI research is underpowered and underrepresented in non-healthcare settings. NSIs lead to heightened anxiety, depression, and PTSD in workers and exposure to pathogens, toxic chemicals and permanent tissue damage. NSI annual reporting is likely an underestimate due to chronic underreporting, and the financial impact including work-loss and healthcare costs continues to rise. Current NSI prevention devices have limited uptake and thus, more affordable, versatile and efficient NSI-prevention devices are needed. RelevanceDue to COVID-19, healthcare workers are at a higher risk of receiving NSIs. Emphasis on safe needle handling practices is necessary to maintain workers physical and psychological safety, to protect workers using COVID-19 PPE on long shifts, and to deliver the high volume of vaccinations required to inoculate the global population. ConclusionNSIs are detrimental to healthcare workers wellbeing, chronically underreported, and poorly surveyed. Areas of future research include determining more effective solutions to reduce NSIs, assessing the validity of NSI reporting systems, and integrating solutions with COVID-19 prevention and vaccination protocols.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.6%
50% of probability mass above
3
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.7%
4
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
5
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
6
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.2%
9
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
10
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
11
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.6%
13
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
14
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
16
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
17
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
Journal of Occupational Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
19
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
23
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
26
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%