Back

Perceived norms about male circumcision and personal circumcision status: a cross-sectional, population-based study in rural Uganda

Perkins, J. M.; Kakuhikire, B.; Baguma, C.; Jeon, S.; Walker, S. F.; Dongre, R.; Kyokunda, V.; Juliet, M.; Satinsky, E. N.; Comfort, A.; Siedner, M.; Ashaba, S.; Tsai, A. C.

2023-04-26 public and global health
10.1101/2023.04.24.23288996 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionOver the past decade, 15 high-priority countries in eastern and southern Africa have promoted voluntary medical male circucmsion for HIV and STI prevention. Despite male circumcision prevalence in Uganda nearly doubling from 26% in 2011 to 43% in 2016, it remained below the target level by 2020. Little is known about perceived norms of male circumcision and their association with circumcision uptake among men. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study targeting all adult residents across eight villages in Rwampara District, southwestern Uganda in 2020-2022. We compared what men and women reported as the adult male circumcision prevalence within their village (perceived norm: >50% (most), 10% to <50% (some), <10%, (few), or do not know) to the aggregated prevalence of circumcision as reported by men aged <50 years. We used a modified multivariable Poisson regression model to estimate the association between perceived norms about male circumcision uptake and personal circumcision status among men. ResultsOverall, 167 (38%) men < 50 years old were circumcised (and 27% of all men were circumcised). Among all 1566 participants (91% response rate), 189 (27%) men and 177 (20%) women underestimated the male circumcision prevalence, thinking that few men in their own village had been circumcised. Additionally, 10% of men and 25% of women reported not knowing the prevalence. Men who underestimated the prevalence were less likely to be circumcised (aRR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.83) compared to those who thought that some village men were circumcised, adjusting for perceived personal risk of HIV, whether any same-household women thought most men were circumcised, and other sociodemographic factors. ConclusionsAcross eight villages, a quarter of the population underestimated the local prevalence of male circumcision. Men who underestimated circumcision uptake were less likely to be circumcised. Future research should evaluate norms-based approaches to promoting male circumcision uptake. Strategies may include disseminating messages about the increasing prevalence of adult male circumcision uptake in Uganda and providing personalized normative feedback to men who underestimated local rates about how uptake is greater than they thought.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
12.5%
2
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
4
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
5
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
10
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
11
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
13
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
14
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
AIDS
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
Journal of the International AIDS Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
23
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Sexually Transmitted Infections
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%