The SToP (See, Treat, Prevent) Skin Sores and Scabies Trial - a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial for skin disease control in remote Western Australia: Statistical analysis plan
Jones, M.; Thomas, H.; Snelling, T.; Bowen, A.; Marsh, J.
Show abstract
The SToP trial is an (open-cohort) stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial (SWCRT) that aims to evaluate a skin health programme comprising three intervention components (1) seeing skin infections; (2) treating skin infections; and (3) preventing skin infections. Four community clusters in the remote Kimberley region of Western Australia will participate in the study. The primary outcome is the diagnosis of impetigo in children (5-9 years) observed during school-based surveillance visits. We provide a detailed, prospective statistical analysis plan (SAP). The plan was written by the trial statistician and details the study design as well as the statistical methods and reporting to be used. The SAP was produced prior to any of the authors viewing any of the trial data. Application of this SAP will minimise bias and supports transparent and reproducible research. SToP is registered under the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12618000520235.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Controlled evaLuation of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for COVID-19 respIraTorY disease (CLARITY): Statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled Bayesian adaptive sample size trial 95%
- Azithromycin mass drug administration to reduce child mortality in Niger (AVENIR II): a master protocol for a cluster-randomized adaptive platform trial to evaluate community-based health interventions 93%
- Development of a consensus extension of the estimands framework for cluster randomised trials (CRT-estimands): results from an international Delphi study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vector control for malaria prevention during humanitarian emergencies: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Risk factors, symptom reporting, healthcare-seeking behaviour and adherence to public health guidance: protocol for Virus Watch, a prospective community cohort study 93%
- Digital delivery of Behavioural Activation therapy to overcome depression and facilitate social and economic transitions of adolescents in South Africa (the DoBAt study): protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- STIMULATE-ICP: A pragmatic, multi-centre, cluster randomised trial of an integrated care pathway with a nested, Phase III, open label, adaptive platform randomised drug trial in individuals with Long COVID: a structured protocol 95%
- Investigating the use of a one-page infographic to improve recruitment and retention to the BASIL+ Randomised Controlled Trial: A Study Within a Trial (SWAT) 94%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prophylaxis for covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis 91%
- Early effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination with BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine and ChAdOx1 adenovirus vector vaccine on symptomatic disease, hospitalisations and mortality in older adults in England 90%
- Adherence to the test, trace and isolate system: results from a time series of 21 nationally representative surveys in the UK (the COVID-19 Rapid Survey of Adherence to Interventions and Responses study) 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Does advance contact with research participants increase response to questionnaires: A Systematic Review and meta-Analysis 92%
- Does pre-notification increase questionnaire response rates: a nested randomised control trial 92%
- Quantitative bias analysis for mismeasured variables in health research: a review of software tools 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.