The Healthcare Access and Delivery Survey: Turkiye Earthquake Response
Rahman, N.; Balkan, I. I.
Show abstract
BackgroundConducting rapid health assessments during large-scale disasters can present significant challenges. While responding to key humanitarian needs is a priority, assessing and understanding gaps and areas for strengthening are vital in ensuring a comprehensive and equitable response. AimTo utilise the perspectives of healthcare workers responding to the Turkiye earthquake 2023, as a means of assessing humanitarian health response gaps. Design and settingObservational, descriptive, prospective study design in Turkiye. MethodOnline survey tool using a Likert-type scale, aligned with minimum standards of humanitarian health response themes, in both English and Turkish distributed by healthcare organisations and academic networks to a convenience sample of health workers responding to the earthquake. Results45 respondents with perspectives demonstrating general limitations across all humanitarian health themes, with particular gaps in: O_LICoordination and response timeliness C_LIO_LIReporting and surveillance C_LIO_LIMental health, palliative care and sexual and reproductive health C_LI ConclusionUsing a survey tool to assess health worker perspective is feasible and provides rapid insights into humanitarian response efforts. Such data can be added to other assessment information to build a more comprehensive picture of needs while engaging with a key stakeholder group, and can support service providers to address gaps and strengthen response actions.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- By the numbers and in their own words: A mixed methods study of unmet needs and humanitarian inclusion of older Syrian refugees in Lebanon 95%
- How to attract and retain health workers in rural areas of a fragile state: findings from a labour market survey in Guinea 95%
- Strengthening government’s response to COVID-19 in Indonesia: a modified Delphi study of medical and health academics 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) communities: a qualitative study on the perspectives of BAME community leaders 95%
- Experiences of Communities with Lebanon's Model of Care for Non-Communicable Diseases (NCD): A Cross-Sectional Household Survey from Greater Beirut 94%
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The cascading impacts of attacks on health in Syria: A qualitative study of health system and community impacts 96%
- The Humanitarian-Development Nexus and Sexual and Reproductive Health Interventions in Fragile Settings: A Scoping Review 95%
- Community-based newborn care intervention fidelity and its implementation drivers in South Wollo Zone, North-east Ethiopia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health service utilisation in Sierra Leone 95%
- How to incentivise doctor attendance in Bangladesh: a latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment 93%
- An analysis of humanitarian and health aid harmonisation over a decade (2011-2019) of the Syrian conflict 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.