PEELing: an integrated and user-centric platform for cell-surface proteomics analysis
Peng, X.; Clements, J.; Jiang, Z.; Preibisch, S.; Li, J.
Show abstract
SummaryMolecular compartmentalization is vital for cellular physiology. Spatially-resolved proteomics allows biologists to survey protein composition and dynamics with subcellular resolution. Here we present PEELing, an integrated package and user-friendly web service for analyzing spatially- resolved proteomics data. PEELing assesses data quality using curated or user-defined references, performs cutoff analysis to remove contaminants, connects to databases for functional annotation, and generates data visualizations--providing a streamlined and reproducible workflow to explore spatially-resolved proteomics data. Availability and ImplementationPEELing and its tutorial are publicly available at https://peeling.janelia.org/. A Python package of PEELing is available at https://github.com/JaneliaSciComp/peeling/. ContactTechnical support for PEELing: peeling@janelia.hhmi.org.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection of Discordant Peptide Quantities in Shotgun Proteomics Data by Peptide Correlation Analysis (PeCorA) 96%
- Analysis and visualization of quantitative proteomics data using FragPipe-Analyst 96%
- ProteoSushi: a software tool to biologically annotate and quantify modification-specific, peptide-centric proteomics datasets 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Monitoring Functional Post-Translational Modifications Using a Data-Driven Proteome Informatic Pipeline 95%
- Parallel Analyses by Mass Spectrometry (MS) and Reverse Phase Protein Array (RPPA) Reveal Complementary Proteomic Profiles in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) Patient Tissues and Cell Cultures 94%
- Performance Characteristics of Zeno Trap Scanning DIA for Sensitive and Quantitative Proteomics at High Throughput 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.