Topology-Aware Focal Loss for 3D Image Segmentation
Demir, A.; Massaad, E.; Kiziltan, B.
Show abstract
The efficacy of segmentation algorithms is frequently compromised by topological errors like overlapping regions, disrupted connections, and voids. To tackle this problem, we introduce a novel loss function, namely Topology-Aware Focal Loss (TAFL), that incorporates the conventional Focal Loss with a topological constraint term based on the Wasserstein distance between the ground truth and predicted segmentation masks persistence diagrams. By enforcing identical topology as the ground truth, the topological constraint can effectively resolve topological errors, while Focal Loss tackles class imbalance. We begin by constructing persistence diagrams from filtered cubical complexes of the ground truth and predicted segmentation masks. We subsequently utilize the Sinkhorn-Knopp algorithm to determine the optimal transport plan between the two persistence diagrams. The resultant transport plan minimizes the cost of transporting mass from one distribution to the other and provides a mapping between the points in the two persistence diagrams. We then compute the Wasserstein distance based on this travel plan to measure the topological dissimilarity between the ground truth and predicted masks. We evaluate our approach by training a 3D U-Net with the MICCAI Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge validation dataset, which requires accurate segmentation of 3D MRI scans that integrate various modalities for the precise identification and tracking of malignant brain tumors. Then, we demonstrate that the quality of segmentation performance is enhanced by regularizing the focal loss through the addition of a topological constraint as a penalty term.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- STAMP: Simultaneous Training and Model Pruning for Low Data Regimes in Medical Image Segmentation 96%
- Track-To-Learn: A general framework for tractography with deep reinforcement learning 95%
- A Framework for Falsifiable Explanations of Machine Learning Models with an Application in Computational Pathology 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Semantic Segmentation of HeLa Cells: An Objective Comparison between one Traditional Algorithm and Three Deep-Learning Architectures 95%
- Fine-tuning TrailMap: The utility of transfer learning to improve the performance of deep learning in axon segmentation of light-sheet microscopy images 95%
- Deep learning models for COVID-19 chest x-ray classification: Preventing shortcut learning using feature disentanglement 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.