Back

Effects of previous infection, vaccination, and hybrid immunity against symptomatic Alpha, Beta, and Delta infections

Altarawneh, H. N. N.; Chemaitelly, H.; Ayoub, H.; Tang, P.; Hasan, M. R.; YASSINE, H. M.; Al Khatib, H. A.; Althani, A. A.; Coyle, P.; Al-Kanaani, Z.; Al-Kuwari, E.; Jeremijenko, A.; Kaleeckal, A. H.; Latif, A. N.; Shaik, R. M.; Abdul Rahim, H. F.; Nasrallah, G. K.; Al-Kuwari, M. G.; Butt, A. A.; Al-Romaihi, H. E.; Al-Thani, M. H.; Al-Khal, A.; Bertollini, R.; Abu-Raddad, L. J.

2023-04-22 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.04.21.23288917 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundProtection against SARS-CoV-2 symptomatic infection and severe COVID-19 of previous infection, mRNA two-dose vaccination, mRNA three-dose vaccination, and hybrid immunity of previous infection and vaccination were investigated in Qatar for the Alpha, Beta, and Delta variants. MethodsSix national, matched, test-negative, case-control studies were conducted between January 18-December 18, 2021 on a sample of 239,120 PCR-positive tests and 6,103,365 PCR-negative tests. ResultsEffectiveness of previous infection against Alpha, Beta, and Delta reinfection was 89.5% (95% CI: 85.5-92.3%), 87.9% (95% CI: 85.4-89.9%), and 90.0% (95% CI: 86.7-92.5%), respectively. Effectiveness of two-dose BNT162b2 vaccination against Alpha, Beta, and Delta infection was 90.5% (95% CI, 83.9-94.4%), 80.5% (95% CI: 79.0-82.0%), and 58.1% (95% CI: 54.6-61.3%), respectively. Effectiveness of three-dose BNT162b2 vaccination against Delta infection was 91.7% (95% CI: 87.1-94.7%). Effectiveness of hybrid immunity of previous infection and two-dose BNT162b2 vaccination was 97.4% (95% CI: 95.4-98.5%) against Beta infection and 94.5% (95% CI: 92.8-95.8%) against Delta infection. Effectiveness of previous infection and three-dose BNT162b2 vaccination was 98.1% (95% CI: 85.7-99.7%) against Delta infection. All five forms of immunity had >90% protection against severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19 regardless of variant. Similar effectiveness estimates were observed for mRNA-1273. ConclusionsAll forms of natural and vaccine immunity prior to Omicron introduction provided strong protection against infection and severe COVID-19. Hybrid immunity conferred the strongest protection and its level was consistent with previous-infection immunity and vaccine immunity acting independently of each other.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.9%
2
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.7%
3
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 31%
5.1%
5
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.1%
6
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
7
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.5%
8
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
9
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
12
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.6%
14
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
15
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
16
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
17
Journal of Travel Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
18
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
21
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
22
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
23
Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%