Faithful AI in Healthcare and Medicine
Xie, Q.; Wang, F.
Show abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI), especially the most recent large language models (LLMs), holds great promise in healthcare and medicine, with applications spanning from biological scientific discovery and clinical patient care to public health policymaking. However, AI methods have the critical concern for generating factually incorrect or unfaithful information, posing potential long-term risks, ethical issues, and other serious consequences. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the faithfulness problem in existing research on AI in healthcare and medicine, with a focus on the analysis of the causes of unfaithful results, evaluation metrics, and mitigation methods. We systematically reviewed the recent progress in optimizing the factuality across various generative medical AI methods, including knowledge-grounded LLMs, text-to-text generation, multimodality-to-text generation, and automatic medical fact-checking tasks. We further discussed the challenges and opportunities of ensuring the faithfulness of AI-generated information in these applications. We expect that this review will assist researchers and practitioners in understanding the faithfulness problem in AI-generated information in healthcare and medicine, as well as the recent progress and challenges in related research. Our review can also serve as a guide for researchers and practitioners who are interested in applying AI in medicine and healthcare.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- CONSORT-TM: Text classification models for assessing the completeness of randomized controlled trial publications 94%
- On evaluation metrics for medical applications of artificial intelligence 92%
- Repurposing Non-pharmacological Interventions for Alzheimer’s Diseases through Link Prediction on Biomedical Literature 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- LCD Benchmark: Long Clinical Document Benchmark on Mortality Prediction for Language Models 96%
- A Novel Question-Answering Framework for Automated Abstract Screening Using Large Language Models 94%
- Analysis of Eligibility Criteria Clusters Based on Large Language Models for Clinical Trial Design 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.