Improving care for high impact users of hospital emergency departments: a mixed-method evaluation of a regional quality improvement programme Supporting High impact users in the Emergency Department (SHarED)
Sillero-Rejon, C.; Kirbyshire, M.; Thorpe, R.; Myring, G.; Evans, C.; Lloyd-Rees, J.; Bezer, A.; McLeod, H.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe need to better manage frequent attenders or high-impact users (HIUs) in hospital emergency departments (EDs) is widely recognised. These patients often have complex medical needs and are also frequent users of other health and care services. The West of England Academic Health Science Network launched its Supporting High impAct useRs in Emergency Departments (SHarED) quality improvement programme to spread a local HIU intervention across six other EDs in five Trusts. AimSHarED aimed to reduce ED attendance and hospital admissions by 20% for enrolled HIUs. To evaluate the implementation of SHarED, we sought to learn about the experience of staff with HIU roles and their ED colleagues, and assess the impact on HIU attendance and admissions. MethodsWe analysed a range of data including semi-structured interviews with 10 HIU staff; ED staff training; an ED staff experience survey; and ED attendances and hospital admissions for 148 HIUs enrolled in SHarED. ResultsStaff with HIU roles were unanimously positive about the benefits of SHarED for both staff and patients. SHarED contributed to supporting ED staff with patient-centred recommendations and provided the basis for more integrated case management across the health and care system. 55% of ED staff received training. There were improvements in staff views relating to confidence, support, training, and HIUs receiving more appropriate care. The mean monthly ED attendance per HIU reduced over time. Follow-up data for 86% (127/148) of cases showed a mean monthly ED attendances per HIU reduced by 33%, from 2.1 to 1.4, between the six months pre- and post-enrolment (p<0.001). ConclusionSHarED illustrates the considerable potential for a quality improvement programme to promote more integrated case management by specialist teams across the health and care system for particularly vulnerable individuals and improve working arrangements for hard-pressed staff. What is already known on this topicFrequent attendance in hospital emergency departments is a worldwide problem that, despite the national recognition of the rationale for better management of high-impact users, has relied on the local efforts of clinicians to change working practices. What this study addsThe Supporting High impAct useRs in Emergency Departments (SHarED) quality improvement programme was successful in spreading a model of high-impact user management based on the identification, proactive management, monitoring and review of these patients, with clear benefits to emergency department staff, and potential benefits to patients and resource use. How this study might affect research, practice or policySHarED illustrates the considerable potential for a quality improvement programme to promote more integrated case management by specialist teams across the health and care system for particularly vulnerable individuals and improve working arrangements for hard-pressed staff.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Navigating uncertain illness trajectories for young children with serious infectious illness: a mixed-methods modified grounded theory study 94%
- A qualitative investigation of crisis cafés in England: their role, implementation, and accessibility 94%
- ‘Beyond Places of Safety’ – a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: Cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians 96%
- Evaluating the impact of a pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme on mortality and healthcare utilisation in patients with covid-19 assessed in Accident and Emergency departments in England: a retrospective matched cohort study 94%
- Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods multi-site case study of a person-centred intervention for constant observation in hospitals with people living with dementia 95%
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 95%
- What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers’ experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding good communication in ambulance pre-alerts to Emergency Department. Findings from a qualitative study of UK emergency services 97%
- Support and follow-up needs of patients discharged from Intensive Care after severe COVID-19: a mixed-methods study of the views of UK general practitioners and intensive care staff during the pandemic’s first wave 95%
- Experiences of supported isolation in returning travellers during the early COVID-19 response: an interview study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient symptoms and experience following COVID-19: results from a UK wide survey 92%
- Post-COVID assessment in a specialist clinical service: a 12-month, single-centre analysis of symptoms and healthcare needs in 1325 individuals 90%
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes of adult patients admitted with COVID-19 in East London: a retrospective cohort analysis 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.