Back

Different Physical Parameters in the Bonds between Platelet Glycoprotein Ibalpha with von Willebrand factor and with Coagulant Factor XI -Results from the Molecular Dynamic Simulation-

Nakayama, M.; Goto, S.; Takemoto, S.; Oka, H.; Yokota, H.; Takagi, S.; Goto, S.

2023-04-18 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.04.16.534191 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundBoth von Willebrand factor (VWF) and coagulation factor XI (FXI) bind with platelet membrane glycoprotein (GP) Ib. However, the differences in the physical parameters in the bonds between VWF-GPIb and FXI-GPIb mediating different biological functions are unclear. MethodsThe FXI molecule was arranged in 9 different initial positions around the structure of GPIb bound to VWF. The position coordinate and velocity vectors of all atoms constructing VWF, GPIb, and FXI were calculated in each 2 femto (10-15) second using the Chemistry at HARvard Macromolecular Mechanics (CHARMM) force field. The physical parameters of VWF-GPIb and FXI-GPIb bonds were calculated by molecular dynamic (MD) simulations. ResultsMD calculation revealed 2.8 to 11.3 times greater positional fluctuations in atoms constructing FXI-GPIb as compared to those constructing VWF-GPIb (RMSDs: 5.9{+/-}1.5 to 18.1{+/-}7.9 [A] for FXI-GPIb vs 1.6{+/-}0.1 to 2.1{+/-}0.3 [A] for VWF-GPIb). The absolute value of non-covalent binding energy generated in FXI-GPIb (65.5{+/-}79.7 to 517.6{+/-}54.2 kcal/mol) was smaller than that generated in VWF-GPIb (678.5{+/-}58.3 to 1000.4{+/-}75.1 kcal/mol). The binding structure of VWF-GPIb was stable and was only minimally influenced by the presence of FXI-GPIb binding. ConclusionsOur MD calculation results revealed that atoms constructing the VWF-GPIb bond are physically more stable and produce more non-covalent binding energy than the bond of FXI-GPIb. The physical parameters in the VWF-GPIb bond were not largely influenced by FXI binding with GPIb.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.