Improving Model Transferability for Clinical Note Section Classification Models Using Continued Pretraining
Zhou, W.; Yetisgen, M.; Afshar, M.; Gao, Y.; Savova, G.; Miller, T.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe classification of clinical note sections is a critical step before doing more fine-grained natural language processing tasks such as social determinants of health extraction and temporal information extraction. Often, clinical note section classification models that achieve high accuracy for one institution experience a large drop of accuracy when transferred to another institution. The objective of this study is to develop methods that classify clinical note sections under the SOAP ("Subjective", "Object", "Assessment" and "Plan") framework with improved transferability. Materials and methodsWe trained the baseline models by fine-tuning BERT-based models, and enhanced their transferability with continued pretraining, including domain adaptive pretraining (DAPT) and task adaptive pretraining (TAPT). We added out-of-domain annotated samples during fine-tuning and observed model performance over a varying number of annotated sample size. Finally, we quantified the impact of continued pretraining in equivalence of the number of in-domain annotated samples added. ResultsWe found continued pretraining improved models only when combined with in-domain annotated samples, improving the F1 score from 0.756 to 0.808, averaged across three datasets. This improvement was equivalent to adding 50.2 in-domain annotated samples. DiscussionAlthough considered a straightforward task when performing in-domain, section classification is still a considerably difficult task when performing cross-domain, even using highly sophisticated neural network-based methods. ConclusionContinued pretraining improved model transferability for cross-domain clinical note section classification in the presence of a small amount of in-domain labeled samples.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- LCD Benchmark: Long Clinical Document Benchmark on Mortality Prediction for Language Models 96%
- Annotation-preserving machine translation of English corpora to validate Dutch clinical concept extraction tools 94%
- A Novel Question-Answering Framework for Automated Abstract Screening Using Large Language Models 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enriching Representation Learning Using 53 Million Patient Notes through Human Phenotype Ontology Embedding 94%
- Comparing neural language models for medical concept representation and patient trajectory prediction 94%
- Building Large-Scale Registries from Unstructured Clinical Notes using a Low-Resource Natural Language Processing Pipeline 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating Knowledge Fusion Models on Detecting Adverse Drug Events in Text 95%
- Uncovering the effects of model initialization on deep model generalization: A study with adult and pediatric chest X-ray images 94%
- Modular Clinical Decision Support Networks (MoDN)—Updatable, Interpretable, and Portable Predictions for Evolving Clinical Environments 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- MelAnalyze: Fact-Checking Melatonin claims using Large Language Models and Natural Language Inference 96%
- Addressing Label Noise for Electronic Health Records: Insights from Computer Vision for Tabular Data 94%
- Evaluating Semantic Similarity Methods for Comparison of Text-derived Phenotype Profiles 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.