Back

Discovery of novel multi-functional peptides by using protein language models and graph-based deep learning

chen, j.; Luo, J.; Yang, C.; Qu, F.; Yan, K.; Liu, B.; Zhang, Y.

2023-04-17 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.04.14.536982 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Functional peptides are one kind of short protein fragments that have a wide range of beneficial functions for living organisms. The majority of previous research focused on mono-functional peptides, but a growing number of multi-functional peptides have been discovered. Although enormous experimental efforts endeavor to assay multi-functional peptides, only a small fraction of millions of known peptides have been explored. Effective and precise techniques for identifying multi-functional peptides can facilitate their discovery and mechanistic understanding. In this article, we presented a novel method, called iMFP-LG, for identifying multi-functional peptides based on protein language models (pLMs) and graph attention networks (GATs). Comparison results showed iMFP-LG significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods on both multifunctional bioactive peptides and multi-functional therapeutic peptides datasets. The interpretability of iMFP-LG was also illustrated by visualizing attention patterns in pLMs and GATs. Regarding to the outstanding performance of iMFP-LG on the identification of multi-functional peptides, we employed iMFP-LG to screen novel candidate peptides with both ACP and AMP functions from millions of known peptides in the UniRef90. As a result, 8 candidate peptides were identified, and 1 candidate that exhibits significant antibacterial and anticancer effect was confirmed through molecular structure alignment and biological experiments. We anticipate iMFP-LG can assist in the discovery of multi-functional peptides and contribute to the advancement of peptide drug design. Availability and implementationThe models and associated code are available at: https://github.com/chen-bioinfo/iMFP-LG. Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available online.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.